Creek vs South American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,595,293 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in South American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 South American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,715 compared to $87,446, a difference of 29.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $96,497, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $101,171, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $52,979, a difference of 16.8%), and median male earnings ($46,594 compared to $54,508, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 41.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 39.3%), and single male poverty (16.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.6%), male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 35.8%, a difference of 9.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 22.1%), births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.0% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 0.44%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.73%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 55.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 53.6%), master's degree (10.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 51.2%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.3% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.24%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.3% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and South American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 54.9%), hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 52.6%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.6%).