Creek vs Jordanian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,597,620 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Jordanians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $109,376, a difference of 38.5%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $91,794, a difference of 35.6%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $109,865, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $51,796, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,949 compared to $64,313, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 58.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 55.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.55%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 31.7%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.24, a difference of 1.4%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (46.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.95%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 57.1%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 53.1%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 66.5%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 60.3%), and hearing disability (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 8.9%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.7%).