Cherokee vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,424,882 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Cherokee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cherokee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cherokee corresponds to a decrease of 7.0 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,203 compared to $44,318, a difference of 19.1%), median household income ($72,682 compared to $84,691, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,843 compared to $93,631, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.0%), householder income over 65 years ($54,133 compared to $59,090, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,848 compared to $52,465, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 34.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and receiving food stamps (13.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 10.8%), divorced or separated (13.7% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (65.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 45.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 37.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.9% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 40.6%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.3%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cherokee and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 50.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.8%), disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 8.6%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.1%).