Immigrants from Oceania vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,692,601 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 40.8 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $59,090, a difference of 9.0%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $100,656, a difference of 5.8%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $84,691, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 1.9%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $44,318, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $52,465, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 15.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 8.3%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.69%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 35.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.9%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.16%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 3.8%).