Bangladeshi vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,732,591 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,897 compared to $44,318, a difference of 23.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,363 compared to $93,631, a difference of 15.1%), and median male earnings ($46,744 compared to $53,680, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $59,090, a difference of 8.0%), median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $39,228, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,589 compared to $52,465, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 27.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.2%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and family households with children (30.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.33%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.2%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.2%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 49.9%), and doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.4% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.73%), 10th grade (92.2% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.78%), and 8th grade (94.3% compared to 95.1%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 6.9%).