Crow vs Uruguayan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,845,740 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 4.624% in Uruguayans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 4,623.8 Uruguayans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $44,318, a difference of 39.7%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $84,691, a difference of 33.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $98,660, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $39,228, a difference of 11.2%), householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $52,465, a difference of 11.6%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $46,190, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 94.8%), single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 91.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 25.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 226.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 222.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 217.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (78.6% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 48.0%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 33.1%, a difference of 21.9%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.23, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), family households (65.3% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 38.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 26.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 88.8%, a difference of 0.57%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 52.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 46.6%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 43.5%), and bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 38.4%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 0.27%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Uruguayan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.7%).