Uruguayan vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,930,205 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.688. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 93.5 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $30,256, a difference of 46.5%), median family income ($100,656 compared to $72,193, a difference of 39.4%), and median household income ($84,691 compared to $61,663, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 13.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $45,248, a difference of 16.0%), and median female earnings ($39,228 compared to $33,205, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (9.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 123.3%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 108.3%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 104.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 38.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 41.5%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 51.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 99.5%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 93.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 90.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 61.0%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 50.6%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (64.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 38.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.7%), bachelor's degree (38.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 57.4%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 57.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.0%), 3rd grade (97.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 79.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 63.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 62.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 17.8%).