Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lebanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lebanese

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
7,328
SOCIAL INDEX
70.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
122nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Lebanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,892,296 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to an increase of 64.8 Tohono O'odham.
Lebanese Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,840 compared to $30,256, a difference of 51.5%), median family income ($107,086 compared to $72,193, a difference of 48.3%), and median male earnings ($57,409 compared to $39,543, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,355 compared to $45,248, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($40,006 compared to $33,205, a difference of 20.5%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.8%).
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricLebaneseTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,840
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,086
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,091
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,226
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,409
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,006
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,355
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,339
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,734
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,287
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
22.1%

Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 128.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 108.1%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 103.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.3%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 53.5%).
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricLebaneseTohono O'odham
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Average
8.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.2%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.3%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Good
20.8%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Tragic
21.5%

Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 100.8%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 95.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 89.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.3%).
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLebaneseTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
8.9%

Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.8%).
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLebaneseTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.6%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.3%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.5%
Tragic
75.1%

Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 78.2%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 68.7%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.96%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLebaneseTohono O'odham
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
49.8%

Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 80.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.0%).
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLebaneseTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.6%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
20.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.4%
Excellent
6.6%

Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 76.6%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 69.9%), and bachelor's degree (40.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricLebaneseTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.2%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.4%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.6%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.4%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 60.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.0%).
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricLebaneseTohono O'odham
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%