Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Canadian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Canadians

Tohono O'odham

Good
Tragic
7,303
SOCIAL INDEX
70.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
123rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Canadian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,933,674 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.239% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 239.2 Tohono O'odham.
Canadian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,858 compared to $30,256, a difference of 51.6%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $72,193, a difference of 47.7%), and median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $39,543, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,336 compared to $45,248, a difference of 15.7%), median female earnings ($39,724 compared to $33,205, a difference of 19.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,230 compared to $49,121, a difference of 26.7%).
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricCanadianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,858
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,597
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,769
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,911
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,286
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,724
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Average
$52,336
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,625
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,560
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,230
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Exceptional
22.1%

Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 149.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 146.9%), and male poverty (10.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 117.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 28.9%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 57.4%).
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricCanadianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.7%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
21.5%

Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 100.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 98.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 83.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.0%).
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCanadianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%

Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 28.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.7%).
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCanadianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.1%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.6%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.4%
Tragic
75.1%

Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 67.7%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 56.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCanadianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Good
64.4%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.9%
Tragic
49.8%

Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 87.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.4%).
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCanadianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Excellent
6.6%

Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 64.3%), master's degree (15.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 61.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.8% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 59.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.53%).
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricCanadianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.4%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.6%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.5%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.8%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.5%

Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 57.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 14.5%).
Canadian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricCanadianTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
3.1%