Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Tohono O'odham

Fair
Tragic
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,222,596 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.146% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 146.5 Tohono O'odham.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,720 compared to $30,256, a difference of 18.1%), median family income ($82,216 compared to $72,193, a difference of 13.9%), and median male earnings ($44,204 compared to $39,543, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 2.1%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $33,205, a difference of 3.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $69,068, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
22.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 82.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 77.8%), and family poverty (11.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 71.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 23.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.6% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 27.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoTohono O'odham
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
21.5%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 116.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 93.9%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
8.9%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 33.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
75.1%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 51.2%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 35.5%), and family households (59.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.6%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.53, a difference of 9.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
49.8%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 55.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 4.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 11.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
6.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 37.6%), associate's degree (41.8% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 31.5%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (96.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and 3rd grade (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 104.6%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 43.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.1%