Danish vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Danish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Danes

Tohono O'odham

Excellent
Tragic
8,781
SOCIAL INDEX
85.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
48th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Danish Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,090,954 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Danish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.658% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Danes corresponds to an increase of 658.5 Tohono O'odham.
Danish Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Danish vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Danish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($105,900 compared to $72,193, a difference of 46.7%), per capita income ($44,095 compared to $30,256, a difference of 45.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,619 compared to $73,774, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,730 compared to $33,205, a difference of 13.6%), householder income under 25 years ($53,041 compared to $45,248, a difference of 17.2%), and median earnings ($46,392 compared to $36,349, a difference of 27.6%).
Danish vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricDanishTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,095
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,900
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Excellent
$87,676
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Average
$46,392
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,246
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,730
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$53,041
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,221
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,619
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,117
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
22.1%

Danish vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Danish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 179.4%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 170.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 137.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 39.5%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 51.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 56.4%).
Danish vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricDanishTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Average
12.8%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
8.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.0%
Tragic
21.5%

Danish vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Danish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 126.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 116.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 105.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.9%).
Danish vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricDanishTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.9%

Danish vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Danish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 42.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 10.9%).
Danish vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricDanishTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.3%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
79.9%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.7%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.3%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
75.1%

Danish vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Danish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 73.7%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 65.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 63.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (66.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.6%).
Danish vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricDanishTohono O'odham
Family Households
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.1%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Tragic
49.8%

Danish vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Danish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 137.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 31.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 26.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.4%).
Danish vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricDanishTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.7%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
6.6%

Danish vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Danish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.9%), bachelor's degree (38.1% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 55.8%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.77%).
Danish vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricDanishTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.5%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.4%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.7%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Good
47.4%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
38.1%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Danish vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Danish and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 58.3%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 49.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.9%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 15.1%).
Danish vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricDanishTohono O'odham
Disability
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.7%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%