Native Hawaiian vs New Zealander Male Poverty
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
New Zealander
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Native Hawaiians
New Zealanders
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
122nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.8%
MALE POVERTY
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
134th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Native Hawaiian vs New Zealander Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 331,823,706 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.359 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,891,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326 and weighted average of 10.8%, a difference of 0.83%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Native Hawaiian | New Zealander |
| Minimum | 3.0% | 2.8% |
| Maximum | 33.7% | 32.1% |
| Range | 30.7% | 29.3% |
| Mean | 11.4% | 9.6% |
| Median | 9.7% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.0% | 5.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 10.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Native Hawaiians and New Zealanders by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.040%), French (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Pakistani (10.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Vietnam (10.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Brazilian (10.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Belarus (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Chilean (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 84.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 84.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 84.1 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Chileans | 83.9 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 83.3 /100 | #131 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 83.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 10.8% |
| New Zealanders | 82.9 /100 | #134 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Brazilians | 82.7 /100 | #135 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 80.9 /100 | #136 | Excellent 10.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 79.2 /100 | #137 | Good 10.8% |
| Yugoslavians | 78.2 /100 | #138 | Good 10.8% |