Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs Pima Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,540,798 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.219 and weighted average of 4.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,148,885 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.440 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Kazakhstan	Pima
Minimum	1.7%	1.8%
Maximum	20.5%	20.0%
Range	18.8%	18.2%
Mean	5.5%	7.3%
Median	4.9%	5.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.9%	3.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.2%	10.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.3%	6.8%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	3.3%	6.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.2%	5.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan and Pima by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Albanian (4.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Finnish (4.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Senegal (4.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Thailand (4.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.7%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Panamanian (4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Africa (4.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Cambodian (4.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and French Canadian (4.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Albanians	95.3 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	95.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.7%
Finns	94.7 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Senegal	94.5 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Thailand	93.7 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| South Central Asia	93.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 4.7%
Austrians	91.9 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 4.8%
Choctaw	90.3 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Serbia	90.2 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Syria	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	89.6 /100 \| #131	Excellent 4.8%
Lithuanians	89.6 /100 \| #132	Excellent 4.8%
Yaqui	89.5 /100 \| #133	Excellent 4.8%
Basques	88.8 /100 \| #134	Excellent 4.8%
Pennsylvania Germans	87.8 /100 \| #135	Excellent 4.8%
French Canadians	87.6 /100 \| #136	Excellent 4.8%
Cambodians	86.9 /100 \| #137	Excellent 4.8%
Immigrants \| Lithuania	86.7 /100 \| #138	Excellent 4.8%
Immigrants \| Africa	86.6 /100 \| #139	Excellent 4.8%
Pima	85.8 /100 \| #140	Excellent 4.8%
Panamanians	85.5 /100 \| #141	Excellent 4.8%