Canadian vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,720,934 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.721. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Canadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.628% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Canadians corresponds to an increase of 627.9 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Canadian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 4.5%), median family income ($106,597 compared to $108,499, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,560 compared to $106,377, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,911 compared to $47,851, a difference of 0.13%), per capita income ($45,858 compared to $45,750, a difference of 0.24%), and median male earnings ($57,286 compared to $57,445, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Canadian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 17.9%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Canadian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.9%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Canadian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Canadian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.8%), births to unmarried women (31.9% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 22.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Canadian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.0%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Canadian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 7.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.57%), disability (12.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.8%).