White/Caucasian vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,714,755 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.957. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 21.4 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($99,800 compared to $108,499, a difference of 8.7%), per capita income ($42,180 compared to $45,750, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $106,377, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $39,421, a difference of 5.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $52,986, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 25.1%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 23.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.3%), single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.71%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 12.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.30%), family households (65.1% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.93%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.10, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.25%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.8%), ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 2.7%).