Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Swedish
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Swedes

Fair
Excellent
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,881
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
41st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Swedish Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,110,355 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.378% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to a decrease of 378.1 Swedes.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Swedish Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $99,136, a difference of 37.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $106,377, a difference of 36.6%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $39,421, a difference of 14.9%), householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $62,736, a difference of 22.1%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $47,851, a difference of 22.2%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoSwedish
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Exceptional
$45,750
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Exceptional
$108,499
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Exceptional
$88,524
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Excellent
$47,851
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Exceptional
$57,445
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Fair
$39,421
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Excellent
$52,986
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Exceptional
$99,136
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Exceptional
$106,377
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Excellent
$62,736
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
29.4%

Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 69.0%), family poverty (11.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 67.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 66.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.9%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 18.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoSwedish
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
9.6%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Average
20.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Exceptional
12.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Exceptional
15.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Exceptional
13.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
13.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
13.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Good
20.6%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Average
16.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
3.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
8.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 48.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoSwedish
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Males
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoSwedish
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Average
65.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
44.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
78.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 47.7%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 27.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.10, a difference of 4.2%), and family households (59.2% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoSwedish
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Good
64.5%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Exceptional
49.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.10
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Good
2.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
29.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 48.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 35.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoSwedish
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
6.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
93.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
61.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.6%

Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 70.0%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.6%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoSwedish
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.4%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.7%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.7%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.6%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.3%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Exceptional
94.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Exceptional
93.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Exceptional
92.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
88.8%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Exceptional
68.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Exceptional
62.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Good
39.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Good
15.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Good
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Excellent
2.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.8%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 24.4%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Swedish Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoSwedish
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Fair
11.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Exceptional
45.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%