Immigrants from Oceania vs Swedish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 301,052,253 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.286. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.240% in Swedes. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 239.9 Swedes.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 14.7%), median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $57,445, a difference of 3.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $62,736, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($47,617 compared to $47,851, a difference of 0.49%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $88,524, a difference of 0.65%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $45,750, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 30.3%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and family poverty (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 17.1%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 15.8%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 44.1%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.3%), currently married (46.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.10, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.65%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 43.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 59.6%), associate's degree (45.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and college, under 1 year (65.6% compared to 68.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Swedish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.72%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.6%).