Bhutanese vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,494,635 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Bhutanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bhutanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bhutanese corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,750 compared to $88,115, a difference of 33.6%), median household income ($100,151 compared to $75,839, a difference of 32.1%), and median family income ($119,800 compared to $91,296, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.6%), householder income under 25 years ($57,078 compared to $49,364, a difference of 15.6%), and median female earnings ($43,648 compared to $35,498, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 38.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 37.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 6.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 70.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 47.8%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 45.2%), and master's degree (17.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.12%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bhutanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 33.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 3.5%).