Subsaharan African vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Hmong
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Subsaharan African Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,616,336 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Hmong.
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 21.4%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $35,498, a difference of 8.2%), and per capita income ($40,152 compared to $38,120, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $84,258, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $56,339, a difference of 0.49%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $49,364, a difference of 1.4%).
Income Metric | Subsaharan African | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $40,152 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,748 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,631 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $44,118 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,408 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,391 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $48,691 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $84,235 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $90,691 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,615 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Tragic 27.7% |
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.38%), single female poverty (23.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and single male poverty (13.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Poverty Metric | Subsaharan African | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.9% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.3% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.0% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.6% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.8% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.7% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.2% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Subsaharan African | Hmong |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 6.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Labor Participation Metric | Subsaharan African | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.4% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.7% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.5% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 81.7% |
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Subsaharan African | Hmong |
Family Households | Tragic 62.1% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.6% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.4% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.8% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Subsaharan African | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.2% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.9% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.9% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Education Level Metric | Subsaharan African | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.1% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.2% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.3% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.9% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.2% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Tragic 1.6% |
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Disability Metric | Subsaharan African | Hmong |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.2% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |