Subsaharan African vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Subsaharan African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sub-Saharan Africans

Hmong

Tragic
Average
977
SOCIAL INDEX
7.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
330th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Subsaharan African Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,616,336 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Subsaharan African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sub-Saharan Africans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sub-Saharan Africans corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Hmong.
Subsaharan African Integration in Hmong Communities

Subsaharan African vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 21.4%), median female earnings ($38,391 compared to $35,498, a difference of 8.2%), and per capita income ($40,152 compared to $38,120, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,235 compared to $84,258, a difference of 0.030%), householder income over 65 years ($56,615 compared to $56,339, a difference of 0.49%), and householder income under 25 years ($48,691 compared to $49,364, a difference of 1.4%).
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Income
Income MetricSubsaharan AfricanHmong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$40,152
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,748
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,631
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,118
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,408
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,391
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,691
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,235
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$90,691
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,615
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Tragic
27.7%

Subsaharan African vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and family poverty (10.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.4% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 0.38%), single female poverty (23.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and single male poverty (13.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricSubsaharan AfricanHmong
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
13.3%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.0%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.8%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.0%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.1%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
23.2%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.4%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.2%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Excellent
10.9%

Subsaharan African vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%), male unemployment (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.6%).
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSubsaharan AfricanHmong
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%

Subsaharan African vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.74%).
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSubsaharan AfricanHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.4%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.7%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.3%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
81.7%

Subsaharan African vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.3%), and married-couple households (41.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSubsaharan AfricanHmong
Family Households
Tragic
62.1%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.6%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.8%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.6%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
27.7%

Subsaharan African vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.2%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.5%).
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSubsaharan AfricanHmong
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.2%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
87.9%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Subsaharan African vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 18.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.17%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricSubsaharan AfricanHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.2%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.3%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Poor
14.2%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Subsaharan African vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Subsaharan African and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.0%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 15.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.0%), cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Subsaharan African vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricSubsaharan AfricanHmong
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%