Japanese vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,011,903 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Japanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.780. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Japanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.058% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Japanese corresponds to an increase of 57.6 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Japanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 16.4%), median household income ($83,395 compared to $75,839, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,834 compared to $88,115, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($57,919 compared to $56,339, a difference of 2.8%), per capita income ($39,870 compared to $38,120, a difference of 4.6%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,365 compared to $49,364, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Japanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 29.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Japanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 65.0%), female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Japanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Japanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.8%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (29.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.2%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.55%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Japanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 71.8%), master's degree (12.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Japanese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.24%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.0%).