Ethiopian vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ethiopians
Hmong
7,266
SOCIAL INDEX
70.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
126th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Ethiopian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,771,344 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Ethiopian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ethiopians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ethiopians corresponds to an increase of 165.7 Hmong.
Ethiopian vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.8%), per capita income ($46,569 compared to $38,120, a difference of 22.2%), and median female earnings ($43,243 compared to $35,498, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,818 compared to $49,364, a difference of 9.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,824 compared to $84,258, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,989 compared to $56,339, a difference of 15.3%).
Income Metric | Ethiopian | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,569 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,251 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,640 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,572 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,243 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,243 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,818 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,824 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,736 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,989 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.8% | Tragic 27.7% |
Ethiopian vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.2%), single father poverty (13.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.58%), child poverty among boys under 16 (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Ethiopian | Hmong |
Poverty | Average 12.2% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Good 13.3% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.4% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.6% | Excellent 10.9% |
Ethiopian vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 59.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Ethiopian | Hmong |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Ethiopian vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (82.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ethiopian | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.3% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.0% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.2% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Tragic 81.7% |
Ethiopian vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 8.8%), births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households (61.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.88%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Ethiopian | Hmong |
Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.2% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Good 3.24 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Fair 6.5% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Ethiopian vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.95%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ethiopian | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.5% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.1% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Ethiopian vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 49.6%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.0%), and master's degree (18.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (89.0% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.20%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.0% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
Education Level Metric | Ethiopian | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.4% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.2% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 91.0% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Fair 89.0% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.9% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.0% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Ethiopian vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ethiopian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 29.0%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 28.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Ethiopian | Hmong |
Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Excellent 2.4% |