Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,036,775 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.224% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 224.3 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $46,700, a difference of 10.9%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $56,837, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $98,267, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $54,335, a difference of 0.030%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $88,934, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.70%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 0.64%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.8%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.23%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and disability (11.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%).