Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,158,750 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 31.5 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.9%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $40,483, a difference of 4.0%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $48,356, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,531 compared to $46,700, a difference of 0.36%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,232 compared to $98,267, a difference of 0.98%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $104,408, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.060%), single female poverty (20.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.25%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.47%), and male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.47%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.020%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and family households (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.2%), master's degree (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and bachelor's degree (41.9% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.050%), and 12th grade, no diploma (91.4% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.020%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.020%), and disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.61%).