Luxembourger vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Brazilians

Excellent
Good
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,125,169 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.186. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 16.7 Brazilians.
Luxembourger Integration in Brazilian Communities

Luxembourger vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $54,335, a difference of 7.9%), median household income ($86,418 compared to $88,934, a difference of 2.9%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($106,183 compared to $106,942, a difference of 0.71%), householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $61,465, a difference of 0.82%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $104,408, a difference of 0.84%).
Luxembourger vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Tragic
26.7%

Luxembourger vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 29.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 22.7%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.80%), single female poverty (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Luxembourger vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerBrazilian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.9%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Excellent
11.1%

Luxembourger vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.7%).
Luxembourger vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerBrazilian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%

Luxembourger vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 20.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Luxembourger vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Luxembourger vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.4%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and currently married (49.3% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (63.3% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerBrazilian
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Excellent
30.4%

Luxembourger vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 93.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.8%).
Luxembourger vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.4%

Luxembourger vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.8%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.9% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.50%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.53%).
Luxembourger vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%

Luxembourger vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 12.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.84%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Luxembourger vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerBrazilian
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%