Lumbee vs Tohono O'odham Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Tohono O'odham
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Tohono O'odham
33.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
34.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Tohono O'odham Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,816,335 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,585,970 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 34.2%, a difference of 3.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Lumbee | Tohono O'odham |
Minimum | 6.8% | 23.3% |
Maximum | 80.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 73.8% | 76.7% |
Mean | 39.4% | 57.1% |
Median | 39.3% | 53.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.1% | 29.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.3% | 83.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.2% | 54.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 28.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 27.8% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Tohono O'odham by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Crow (32.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 3.3%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 0.30%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 1.2%), Crow (32.4%, a difference of 5.5%), Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 8.1%), and Sioux (31.3%, a difference of 9.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |