Lumbee vs Sioux Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Sioux
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Sioux
33.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
31.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Sioux Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,816,335 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,047,098 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 31.3%, a difference of 5.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Sioux |
| Minimum | 6.8% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 80.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 73.8% | 92.9% |
| Mean | 39.4% | 49.1% |
| Median | 39.3% | 43.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.1% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.3% | 64.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.2% | 35.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 24.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 24.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lumbee and Sioux by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Crow (32.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (34.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 4.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 2.0%), Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 2.8%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Crow (32.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |