Lumbee vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Lumbee
Chickasaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Lumbee
Chickasaw
33.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lumbee vs Chickasaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,816,335 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,052,400 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 26.3%, a difference of 25.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lumbee | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 6.8% | 11.1% |
| Maximum | 80.6% | 100.0% |
| Range | 73.8% | 88.9% |
| Mean | 39.4% | 35.8% |
| Median | 39.3% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 30.1% | 24.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 48.3% | 42.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.2% | 17.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.1% | 19.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 18.8% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Lumbee by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Crow (32.4%, a difference of 1.8%), Houma (33.8%, a difference of 2.4%), Puerto Rican (34.1%, a difference of 3.3%), Tohono O'odham (34.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Black/African American (26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 0.63%), Ottawa (26.0%, a difference of 1.0%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Somalia (25.8%, a difference of 1.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 25.5% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 25.6% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 25.7% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |