Immigrants from Micronesia vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Alaskan Athabascan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Alaskan Athabascans
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Alaskan Athabascan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,492,731 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Micronesia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.103 and weighted average of 23.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,584,348 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362 and weighted average of 23.6%, a difference of 2.5%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Micronesia | Alaskan Athabascan |
Minimum | 5.4% | 6.0% |
Maximum | 54.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 48.7% | 94.0% |
Mean | 26.0% | 41.2% |
Median | 22.8% | 33.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 19.8% | 20.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 29.2% | 51.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.4% | 31.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.8% | 28.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.6% | 28.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Micronesia and Alaskan Athabascans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Micronesia are Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.060%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.16%), Central American (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Nonimmigrants (23.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (23.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.49%), and Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |