Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Community & Social Service
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa JollaLa MesaLa MiradaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoragaMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles

4.6%
36.8%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service  in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 90068 36.8% 11.5% (+25.3)#22 11.2% (+25.5)#356
2. 90027 32.4% 11.5% (+21.0)#35 11.2% (+21.2)#470
3. 90039 29.8% 11.5% (+18.3)#42 11.2% (+18.6)#597
4. 90036 27.6% 11.5% (+16.1)#55 11.2% (+16.4)#721
5. 90035 27.1% 11.5% (+15.6)#59 11.2% (+15.9)#760
6. 90056 26.2% 11.5% (+14.7)#65 11.2% (+15.0)#851
7. 90048 26.0% 11.5% (+14.5)#67 11.2% (+14.8)#873
8. 90013 26.0% 11.5% (+14.5)#68 11.2% (+14.7)#875
9. 90077 25.9% 11.5% (+14.4)#69 11.2% (+14.7)#878
10. 90041 25.7% 11.5% (+14.2)#72 11.2% (+14.5)#903
11. 90046 25.0% 11.5% (+13.5)#81 11.2% (+13.7)#989
12. 90028 24.0% 11.5% (+12.6)#91 11.2% (+12.8)#1,101
13. 90064 23.4% 11.5% (+12.0)#97 11.2% (+12.2)#1,204
14. 90024 23.2% 11.5% (+11.7)#101 11.2% (+12.0)#1,243
15. 90012 22.8% 11.5% (+11.3)#112 11.2% (+11.6)#1,309
16. 90066 22.8% 11.5% (+11.3)#113 11.2% (+11.5)#1,320
17. 90045 22.7% 11.5% (+11.2)#114 11.2% (+11.5)#1,329
18. 90026 22.6% 11.5% (+11.1)#119 11.2% (+11.4)#1,347
19. 90089 22.5% 11.5% (+11.0)#122 11.2% (+11.3)#1,361
20. 90049 22.2% 11.5% (+10.7)#126 11.2% (+11.0)#1,433
21. 90025 22.1% 11.5% (+10.6)#127 11.2% (+10.9)#1,454
22. 90065 20.3% 11.5% (+8.85)#158 11.2% (+9.12)#1,923
23. 90042 20.3% 11.5% (+8.83)#159 11.2% (+9.10)#1,926
24. 90034 20.3% 11.5% (+8.81)#161 11.2% (+9.08)#1,932
25. 90067 19.5% 11.5% (+8.05)#178 11.2% (+8.32)#2,186
26. 90019 19.2% 11.5% (+7.67)#188 11.2% (+7.94)#2,330
27. 90010 19.1% 11.5% (+7.58)#192 11.2% (+7.85)#2,369
28. 90021 19.0% 11.5% (+7.50)#196 11.2% (+7.77)#2,403
29. 90015 17.9% 11.5% (+6.40)#222 11.2% (+6.67)#2,880
30. 90014 17.4% 11.5% (+5.94)#238 11.2% (+6.21)#3,098
31. 90038 16.9% 11.5% (+5.46)#261 11.2% (+5.73)#3,421
32. 90007 16.8% 11.5% (+5.32)#266 11.2% (+5.59)#3,511
33. 90029 16.0% 11.5% (+4.55)#312 11.2% (+4.82)#4,051
34. 90004 16.0% 11.5% (+4.49)#315 11.2% (+4.76)#4,085
35. 90032 15.0% 11.5% (+3.51)#385 11.2% (+3.78)#4,973
36. 90058 14.6% 11.5% (+3.09)#411 11.2% (+3.36)#5,397
37. 90008 14.0% 11.5% (+2.50)#456 11.2% (+2.77)#6,098
38. 90020 13.6% 11.5% (+2.08)#491 11.2% (+2.35)#6,660
39. 90017 13.5% 11.5% (+2.04)#500 11.2% (+2.31)#6,715
40. 90043 13.5% 11.5% (+1.99)#504 11.2% (+2.26)#6,789
41. 90016 13.2% 11.5% (+1.68)#542 11.2% (+1.95)#7,292
42. 90031 12.8% 11.5% (+1.32)#575 11.2% (+1.59)#7,872
43. 90018 12.3% 11.5% (+0.851)#615 11.2% (+1.12)#8,725
44. 90005 11.6% 11.5% (+0.125)#713 11.2% (+0.395)#10,211
45. 90033 10.2% 11.5% (-1.28)#896 11.2% (-1.01)#13,593
46. 90047 9.9% 11.5% (-1.56)#934 11.2% (-1.29)#14,323
47. 90062 9.8% 11.5% (-1.72)#951 11.2% (-1.45)#14,713
48. 90006 8.8% 11.5% (-2.72)#1,077 11.2% (-2.45)#17,457
49. 90057 8.2% 11.5% (-3.29)#1,137 11.2% (-3.02)#19,022
50. 90040 8.1% 11.5% (-3.39)#1,151 11.2% (-3.12)#19,305
51. 90063 7.9% 11.5% (-3.61)#1,176 11.2% (-3.34)#19,954
52. 90022 7.7% 11.5% (-3.80)#1,201 11.2% (-3.53)#20,431
53. 90059 7.4% 11.5% (-4.11)#1,236 11.2% (-3.84)#21,224
54. 90011 6.3% 11.5% (-5.19)#1,374 11.2% (-4.92)#23,728
55. 90023 6.3% 11.5% (-5.21)#1,376 11.2% (-4.94)#23,768
56. 90037 5.9% 11.5% (-5.58)#1,417 11.2% (-5.31)#24,551
57. 90044 5.9% 11.5% (-5.62)#1,420 11.2% (-5.35)#24,642
58. 90002 5.6% 11.5% (-5.92)#1,435 11.2% (-5.65)#25,206
59. 90001 5.4% 11.5% (-6.13)#1,445 11.2% (-5.86)#25,609
60. 90061 4.7% 11.5% (-6.74)#1,486 11.2% (-6.47)#26,601
61. 90003 4.6% 11.5% (-6.89)#1,494 11.2% (-6.62)#26,812

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
36.8%
#2
32.4%
#3
29.8%
#4
27.6%
#5
27.1%
#6
26.2%
#7
26.0%
#8
26.0%
#9
25.9%
#10
25.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles, CA?
90068 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles, CA with 36.8%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in Los Angeles is 15.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in California?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in California is 11.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Community & Social Service in the United States is 11.2%.