Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Los Angeles

5.9%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 90089 100.0% 13.2% (+86.8)#1 13.7% (+86.3)#5
2. 90071 68.3% 13.2% (+55.2)#19 13.7% (+54.6)#256
3. 90013 44.9% 13.2% (+31.7)#43 13.7% (+31.2)#906
4. 90017 40.6% 13.2% (+27.4)#57 13.7% (+26.9)#1,198
5. 90021 39.9% 13.2% (+26.7)#61 13.7% (+26.2)#1,255
6. 90058 36.1% 13.2% (+22.9)#80 13.7% (+22.4)#1,651
7. 90007 33.9% 13.2% (+20.7)#94 13.7% (+20.2)#2,002
8. 90057 33.0% 13.2% (+19.8)#99 13.7% (+19.3)#2,160
9. 90014 32.6% 13.2% (+19.4)#103 13.7% (+18.9)#2,244
10. 90024 31.0% 13.2% (+17.8)#115 13.7% (+17.3)#2,564
11. 90011 30.3% 13.2% (+17.1)#125 13.7% (+16.6)#2,727
12. 90033 30.3% 13.2% (+17.1)#128 13.7% (+16.6)#2,743
13. 90005 29.7% 13.2% (+16.6)#136 13.7% (+16.0)#2,898
14. 90015 29.5% 13.2% (+16.3)#139 13.7% (+15.8)#2,943
15. 90003 28.8% 13.2% (+15.7)#147 13.7% (+15.1)#3,128
16. 90044 28.5% 13.2% (+15.3)#150 13.7% (+14.8)#3,219
17. 90012 27.9% 13.2% (+14.8)#155 13.7% (+14.2)#3,394
18. 90037 27.3% 13.2% (+14.1)#164 13.7% (+13.6)#3,573
19. 90006 25.6% 13.2% (+12.5)#198 13.7% (+11.9)#4,206
20. 90002 25.6% 13.2% (+12.4)#200 13.7% (+11.9)#4,229
21. 90001 25.5% 13.2% (+12.3)#204 13.7% (+11.8)#4,274
22. 90029 25.2% 13.2% (+12.0)#210 13.7% (+11.5)#4,383
23. 90023 25.0% 13.2% (+11.9)#213 13.7% (+11.3)#4,449
24. 90059 24.9% 13.2% (+11.7)#220 13.7% (+11.2)#4,534
25. 90061 24.7% 13.2% (+11.5)#221 13.7% (+11.0)#4,598
26. 90018 22.4% 13.2% (+9.18)#265 13.7% (+8.66)#5,741
27. 90038 22.3% 13.2% (+9.17)#266 13.7% (+8.65)#5,750
28. 90028 21.3% 13.2% (+8.17)#301 13.7% (+7.65)#6,363
29. 90031 20.5% 13.2% (+7.36)#336 13.7% (+6.84)#6,902
30. 90004 20.4% 13.2% (+7.18)#345 13.7% (+6.66)#7,006
31. 90047 20.0% 13.2% (+6.83)#357 13.7% (+6.31)#7,235
32. 90019 19.8% 13.2% (+6.59)#372 13.7% (+6.07)#7,406
33. 90026 19.4% 13.2% (+6.21)#391 13.7% (+5.69)#7,699
34. 90063 19.2% 13.2% (+5.99)#400 13.7% (+5.47)#7,863
35. 90022 18.8% 13.2% (+5.64)#418 13.7% (+5.13)#8,152
36. 90008 18.8% 13.2% (+5.62)#420 13.7% (+5.10)#8,179
37. 90020 18.7% 13.2% (+5.50)#430 13.7% (+4.98)#8,280
38. 90016 17.9% 13.2% (+4.76)#463 13.7% (+4.24)#8,902
39. 90062 17.2% 13.2% (+3.99)#494 13.7% (+3.47)#9,588
40. 90032 16.1% 13.2% (+2.89)#543 13.7% (+2.37)#10,686
41. 90043 15.8% 13.2% (+2.64)#563 13.7% (+2.12)#10,982
42. 90027 15.7% 13.2% (+2.53)#570 13.7% (+2.02)#11,078
43. 90040 15.5% 13.2% (+2.36)#580 13.7% (+1.84)#11,269
44. 90065 15.1% 13.2% (+1.95)#600 13.7% (+1.43)#11,714
45. 90046 13.4% 13.2% (+0.182)#705 13.7% (-0.338)#13,844
46. 90068 12.8% 13.2% (-0.415)#747 13.7% (-0.934)#14,656
47. 90025 12.6% 13.2% (-0.594)#757 13.7% (-1.11)#14,885
48. 90048 12.0% 13.2% (-1.17)#794 13.7% (-1.69)#15,636
49. 90041 11.7% 13.2% (-1.49)#827 13.7% (-2.01)#16,085
50. 90036 11.6% 13.2% (-1.58)#833 13.7% (-2.10)#16,213
51. 90042 11.1% 13.2% (-2.04)#878 13.7% (-2.56)#16,917
52. 90039 9.7% 13.2% (-3.48)#1,000 13.7% (-4.00)#19,023
53. 90010 9.7% 13.2% (-3.48)#1,001 13.7% (-4.00)#19,036
54. 90067 8.9% 13.2% (-4.31)#1,100 13.7% (-4.83)#20,380
55. 90035 8.6% 13.2% (-4.56)#1,122 13.7% (-5.08)#20,780
56. 90045 8.6% 13.2% (-4.58)#1,125 13.7% (-5.10)#20,825
57. 90056 8.6% 13.2% (-4.61)#1,127 13.7% (-5.13)#20,876
58. 90034 8.5% 13.2% (-4.66)#1,137 13.7% (-5.18)#20,970
59. 90064 8.2% 13.2% (-4.97)#1,165 13.7% (-5.49)#21,455
60. 90066 7.1% 13.2% (-6.07)#1,283 13.7% (-6.59)#23,189
61. 90049 7.0% 13.2% (-6.14)#1,290 13.7% (-6.66)#23,288
62. 90077 5.9% 13.2% (-7.25)#1,416 13.7% (-7.77)#25,079

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
100.0%
#2
68.3%
#3
44.9%
#4
40.6%
#5
39.9%
#6
36.1%
#7
33.9%
#8
33.0%
#9
32.6%
#10
31.0%
What zip code has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Los Angeles, CA?
90089 has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Los Angeles, CA with 100.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Los Angeles, CA?
Poverty Level Among Females in Los Angeles is 18.1%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in California?
Poverty Level Among Females in California is 13.2%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.