Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Management
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEdwardsEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa JollaLa MesaLa MiradaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoragaMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles

2.4%
22.6%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1. 90048 22.6% 11.2% (+11.5)#132 11.0% (+11.6)#2,200
2. 90049 21.7% 11.2% (+10.5)#170 11.0% (+10.7)#2,520
3. 90067 21.0% 11.2% (+9.81)#194 11.0% (+9.98)#2,743
4. 90077 20.6% 11.2% (+9.40)#206 11.0% (+9.57)#2,898
5. 90014 19.4% 11.2% (+8.24)#249 11.0% (+8.41)#3,432
6. 90064 19.2% 11.2% (+7.97)#256 11.0% (+8.13)#3,571
7. 90045 17.7% 11.2% (+6.53)#323 11.0% (+6.70)#4,477
8. 90068 17.5% 11.2% (+6.29)#331 11.0% (+6.46)#4,660
9. 90025 17.4% 11.2% (+6.26)#336 11.0% (+6.43)#4,685
10. 90036 17.4% 11.2% (+6.24)#337 11.0% (+6.41)#4,704
11. 90056 16.8% 11.2% (+5.64)#365 11.0% (+5.81)#5,169
12. 90035 15.6% 11.2% (+4.43)#434 11.0% (+4.60)#6,319
13. 90046 14.8% 11.2% (+3.60)#496 11.0% (+3.76)#7,325
14. 90013 14.5% 11.2% (+3.35)#523 11.0% (+3.51)#7,660
15. 90028 14.2% 11.2% (+3.04)#547 11.0% (+3.21)#8,080
16. 90015 14.2% 11.2% (+3.01)#551 11.0% (+3.18)#8,125
17. 90034 14.1% 11.2% (+2.95)#558 11.0% (+3.12)#8,196
18. 90066 14.1% 11.2% (+2.87)#570 11.0% (+3.04)#8,331
19. 90039 13.6% 11.2% (+2.39)#632 11.0% (+2.56)#9,042
20. 90027 13.2% 11.2% (+2.04)#657 11.0% (+2.21)#9,572
21. 90043 12.7% 11.2% (+1.51)#700 11.0% (+1.68)#10,472
22. 90041 12.6% 11.2% (+1.41)#711 11.0% (+1.58)#10,650
23. 90024 11.8% 11.2% (+0.621)#785 11.0% (+0.789)#12,138
24. 90010 11.8% 11.2% (+0.577)#789 11.0% (+0.745)#12,218
25. 90042 11.7% 11.2% (+0.518)#799 11.0% (+0.686)#12,352
26. 90019 11.0% 11.2% (-0.234)#870 11.0% (-0.065)#13,969
27. 90021 10.7% 11.2% (-0.479)#891 11.0% (-0.311)#14,561
28. 90026 10.4% 11.2% (-0.773)#922 11.0% (-0.605)#15,242
29. 90012 10.1% 11.2% (-1.04)#950 11.0% (-0.877)#15,880
30. 90065 10.1% 11.2% (-1.05)#951 11.0% (-0.880)#15,886
31. 90089 9.7% 11.2% (-1.45)#994 11.0% (-1.29)#16,914
32. 90005 9.7% 11.2% (-1.47)#997 11.0% (-1.30)#16,969
33. 90020 9.6% 11.2% (-1.59)#1,018 11.0% (-1.43)#17,285
34. 90017 9.4% 11.2% (-1.78)#1,031 11.0% (-1.61)#17,730
35. 90008 9.3% 11.2% (-1.85)#1,035 11.0% (-1.68)#17,915
36. 90038 9.1% 11.2% (-2.12)#1,067 11.0% (-1.96)#18,593
37. 90047 8.8% 11.2% (-2.40)#1,090 11.0% (-2.24)#19,273
38. 90018 8.4% 11.2% (-2.78)#1,131 11.0% (-2.61)#20,225
39. 90029 8.4% 11.2% (-2.80)#1,135 11.0% (-2.63)#20,274
40. 90032 8.3% 11.2% (-2.86)#1,139 11.0% (-2.69)#20,436
41. 90004 8.3% 11.2% (-2.91)#1,143 11.0% (-2.74)#20,541
42. 90016 8.0% 11.2% (-3.16)#1,171 11.0% (-2.99)#21,135
43. 90057 6.6% 11.2% (-4.63)#1,333 11.0% (-4.46)#24,443
44. 90007 6.4% 11.2% (-4.79)#1,346 11.0% (-4.63)#24,757
45. 90031 6.4% 11.2% (-4.83)#1,352 11.0% (-4.67)#24,847
46. 90006 6.1% 11.2% (-5.04)#1,367 11.0% (-4.87)#25,228
47. 90061 6.0% 11.2% (-5.19)#1,379 11.0% (-5.02)#25,488
48. 90040 5.9% 11.2% (-5.33)#1,390 11.0% (-5.16)#25,724
49. 90063 5.8% 11.2% (-5.39)#1,400 11.0% (-5.22)#25,848
50. 90044 5.1% 11.2% (-6.08)#1,463 11.0% (-5.91)#26,987
51. 90062 4.9% 11.2% (-6.25)#1,474 11.0% (-6.08)#27,202
52. 90037 4.7% 11.2% (-6.50)#1,487 11.0% (-6.33)#27,524
53. 90023 4.7% 11.2% (-6.53)#1,490 11.0% (-6.36)#27,557
54. 90001 4.3% 11.2% (-6.93)#1,513 11.0% (-6.77)#28,050
55. 90033 4.2% 11.2% (-7.00)#1,521 11.0% (-6.84)#28,131
56. 90059 4.1% 11.2% (-7.12)#1,528 11.0% (-6.95)#28,263
57. 90022 3.9% 11.2% (-7.25)#1,532 11.0% (-7.08)#28,386
58. 90002 3.9% 11.2% (-7.27)#1,533 11.0% (-7.10)#28,406
59. 90011 3.5% 11.2% (-7.69)#1,553 11.0% (-7.52)#28,774
60. 90003 3.5% 11.2% (-7.70)#1,555 11.0% (-7.53)#28,787
61. 90058 2.4% 11.2% (-8.76)#1,592 11.0% (-8.59)#29,556

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
22.6%
#2
21.7%
#3
21.0%
#4
20.6%
#5
19.4%
#6
19.2%
#7
17.7%
#8
17.5%
#9
17.4%
#10
17.4%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles, CA?
90048 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles, CA with 22.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in Los Angeles is 10.6%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in California?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in California is 11.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Management in the United States is 11.0%.