Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Health Technologists
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa JollaLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles

0.0%
10.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.900679.3%3.7%(+5.63)#724.3%(+5.01)#1,832
2.900499.1%3.7%(+5.47)#764.3%(+4.84)#1,947
3.900568.5%3.7%(+4.81)#1004.3%(+4.19)#2,410
4.900247.7%3.7%(+4.03)#1324.3%(+3.40)#3,141
5.900776.8%3.7%(+3.14)#1874.3%(+2.52)#4,354
6.900146.8%3.7%(+3.11)#1904.3%(+2.49)#4,414
7.900136.4%3.7%(+2.70)#2154.3%(+2.08)#5,176
8.900646.3%3.7%(+2.66)#2204.3%(+2.03)#5,254
9.900256.2%3.7%(+2.52)#2344.3%(+1.89)#5,571
10.900395.8%3.7%(+2.17)#2834.3%(+1.55)#6,378
11.900355.8%3.7%(+2.13)#2934.3%(+1.50)#6,483
12.900415.6%3.7%(+1.96)#3184.3%(+1.33)#6,906
13.900485.5%3.7%(+1.81)#3314.3%(+1.19)#7,301
14.900104.6%3.7%(+0.917)#4864.3%(+0.293)#10,179
15.900454.6%3.7%(+0.896)#4894.3%(+0.272)#10,248
16.900364.4%3.7%(+0.714)#5254.3%(+0.090)#11,000
17.900664.3%3.7%(+0.676)#5324.3%(+0.052)#11,167
18.900124.1%3.7%(+0.423)#5824.3%(-0.201)#12,202
19.900343.9%3.7%(+0.264)#6204.3%(-0.360)#12,886
20.900203.7%3.7%(+0.058)#6774.3%(-0.566)#13,820
21.900273.7%3.7%(+0.031)#6794.3%(-0.593)#13,949
22.900463.7%3.7%(+0.014)#6834.3%(-0.610)#14,015
23.900293.6%3.7%(-0.047)#7014.3%(-0.671)#14,291
24.900653.5%3.7%(-0.158)#7294.3%(-0.782)#14,781
25.900213.0%3.7%(-0.634)#8444.3%(-1.26)#16,970
26.900423.0%3.7%(-0.700)#8604.3%(-1.32)#17,246
27.900192.7%3.7%(-0.934)#9144.3%(-1.56)#18,369
28.900312.6%3.7%(-1.04)#9344.3%(-1.66)#18,853
29.900152.6%3.7%(-1.08)#9474.3%(-1.70)#19,038
30.900432.6%3.7%(-1.11)#9514.3%(-1.73)#19,164
31.900082.6%3.7%(-1.11)#9534.3%(-1.74)#19,188
32.900682.5%3.7%(-1.16)#9634.3%(-1.78)#19,377
33.900052.5%3.7%(-1.19)#9774.3%(-1.81)#19,525
34.900182.4%3.7%(-1.24)#9904.3%(-1.86)#19,754
35.900042.4%3.7%(-1.26)#9974.3%(-1.88)#19,857
36.900162.3%3.7%(-1.37)#1,0244.3%(-1.99)#20,317
37.900322.3%3.7%(-1.37)#1,0264.3%(-2.00)#20,339
38.900472.1%3.7%(-1.58)#1,0824.3%(-2.20)#21,200
39.900261.9%3.7%(-1.74)#1,1204.3%(-2.36)#21,878
40.900281.9%3.7%(-1.78)#1,1354.3%(-2.41)#22,077
41.900571.8%3.7%(-1.85)#1,1544.3%(-2.47)#22,322
42.900621.6%3.7%(-2.07)#1,1924.3%(-2.70)#23,126
43.900171.3%3.7%(-2.35)#1,2444.3%(-2.98)#24,040
44.900061.1%3.7%(-2.58)#1,2854.3%(-3.20)#24,765
45.900631.1%3.7%(-2.60)#1,2894.3%(-3.22)#24,818
46.900591.0%3.7%(-2.63)#1,2954.3%(-3.25)#24,917
47.900070.99%3.7%(-2.67)#1,3064.3%(-3.29)#25,035
48.900380.95%3.7%(-2.71)#1,3124.3%(-3.33)#25,136
49.900610.89%3.7%(-2.77)#1,3224.3%(-3.39)#25,303
50.900330.86%3.7%(-2.80)#1,3244.3%(-3.42)#25,382
51.900220.81%3.7%(-2.86)#1,3314.3%(-3.48)#25,507
52.900010.68%3.7%(-2.98)#1,3584.3%(-3.60)#25,815
53.900400.63%3.7%(-3.03)#1,3634.3%(-3.66)#25,920
54.900370.62%3.7%(-3.04)#1,3644.3%(-3.66)#25,930
55.900890.60%3.7%(-3.06)#1,3674.3%(-3.69)#25,983
56.900030.54%3.7%(-3.12)#1,3744.3%(-3.75)#26,093
57.900440.52%3.7%(-3.15)#1,3774.3%(-3.77)#26,125
58.900110.45%3.7%(-3.22)#1,3854.3%(-3.84)#26,241
59.900020.44%3.7%(-3.22)#1,3874.3%(-3.85)#26,251
60.900230.20%3.7%(-3.46)#1,4004.3%(-4.08)#26,596

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
9.3%
#2
9.1%
#3
8.5%
#4
7.7%
#5
6.8%
#6
6.8%
#7
6.4%
#8
6.3%
#9
6.2%
#10
5.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles, CA?
90067 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles, CA with 9.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in Los Angeles is 3.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in California?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in California is 3.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Health Technologists in the United States is 4.3%.