Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Law Enforcement
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa MiradaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoragaMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles

0.0%
1.5%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.900431.3%0.80%(+0.526)#3340.96%(+0.368)#8,190
2.900591.1%0.80%(+0.338)#4000.96%(+0.180)#9,554
3.900471.1%0.80%(+0.284)#4220.96%(+0.126)#9,978
4.900080.97%0.80%(+0.169)#4750.96%(+0.012)#11,004
5.900440.70%0.80%(-0.103)#6220.96%(-0.261)#13,817
6.900230.68%0.80%(-0.123)#6370.96%(-0.281)#14,018
7.900630.67%0.80%(-0.132)#6440.96%(-0.290)#14,127
8.900220.62%0.80%(-0.183)#6690.96%(-0.340)#14,723
9.900560.62%0.80%(-0.186)#6730.96%(-0.344)#14,761
10.900130.61%0.80%(-0.197)#6860.96%(-0.355)#14,884
11.900400.59%0.80%(-0.213)#6950.96%(-0.371)#15,084
12.900240.51%0.80%(-0.297)#7630.96%(-0.455)#16,085
13.900160.50%0.80%(-0.303)#7660.96%(-0.461)#16,163
14.900170.41%0.80%(-0.396)#8430.96%(-0.553)#17,319
15.900350.37%0.80%(-0.434)#8810.96%(-0.592)#17,806
16.900020.37%0.80%(-0.436)#8820.96%(-0.593)#17,827
17.900610.37%0.80%(-0.438)#8880.96%(-0.596)#17,862
18.900110.35%0.80%(-0.458)#9030.96%(-0.616)#18,108
19.900320.34%0.80%(-0.463)#9080.96%(-0.621)#18,164
20.900390.31%0.80%(-0.494)#9490.96%(-0.651)#18,560
21.900420.30%0.80%(-0.501)#9600.96%(-0.659)#18,643
22.900660.28%0.80%(-0.522)#9750.96%(-0.680)#18,885
23.900280.27%0.80%(-0.540)#9970.96%(-0.697)#19,107
24.900370.26%0.80%(-0.541)#9980.96%(-0.699)#19,126
25.900260.25%0.80%(-0.554)#1,0100.96%(-0.712)#19,275
26.900190.24%0.80%(-0.561)#1,0190.96%(-0.718)#19,353
27.900330.24%0.80%(-0.561)#1,0210.96%(-0.719)#19,364
28.900010.24%0.80%(-0.568)#1,0250.96%(-0.726)#19,422
29.900640.23%0.80%(-0.579)#1,0370.96%(-0.736)#19,556
30.900060.22%0.80%(-0.581)#1,0400.96%(-0.739)#19,580
31.900380.20%0.80%(-0.606)#1,0580.96%(-0.764)#19,826
32.900140.19%0.80%(-0.613)#1,0660.96%(-0.771)#19,893
33.900050.18%0.80%(-0.623)#1,0750.96%(-0.780)#20,000
34.900040.18%0.80%(-0.630)#1,0780.96%(-0.787)#20,065
35.900120.17%0.80%(-0.637)#1,0870.96%(-0.795)#20,141
36.900410.16%0.80%(-0.649)#1,0970.96%(-0.807)#20,236
37.900030.15%0.80%(-0.657)#1,1060.96%(-0.815)#20,306
38.900270.14%0.80%(-0.662)#1,1120.96%(-0.820)#20,339
39.900290.14%0.80%(-0.662)#1,1130.96%(-0.820)#20,342
40.900650.14%0.80%(-0.666)#1,1180.96%(-0.824)#20,383
41.900180.13%0.80%(-0.675)#1,1280.96%(-0.833)#20,478
42.900460.12%0.80%(-0.685)#1,1410.96%(-0.843)#20,582
43.900450.11%0.80%(-0.691)#1,1450.96%(-0.848)#20,624
44.900620.095%0.80%(-0.710)#1,1530.96%(-0.868)#20,751
45.900480.079%0.80%(-0.726)#1,1630.96%(-0.884)#20,834
46.900680.052%0.80%(-0.753)#1,1780.96%(-0.911)#20,987
47.900310.048%0.80%(-0.757)#1,1820.96%(-0.914)#21,000
48.900250.039%0.80%(-0.766)#1,1850.96%(-0.924)#21,018
49.900490.025%0.80%(-0.780)#1,1900.96%(-0.937)#21,041
50.900070.022%0.80%(-0.783)#1,1920.96%(-0.941)#21,044

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
1.3%
#2
1.1%
#3
1.1%
#4
0.97%
#5
0.70%
#6
0.68%
#7
0.67%
#8
0.62%
#9
0.62%
#10
0.61%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles, CA?
90043 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles, CA with 1.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in Los Angeles is 0.29%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in California?
Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in California is 0.80%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Law Enforcement in the United States is 0.96%.