Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Real Estate, Rental & Leasing
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles

0.0%
15.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.9006712.3%2.1%(+10.2)#261.9%(+10.4)#253
2.900135.7%2.1%(+3.59)#901.9%(+3.82)#1,072
3.900495.5%2.1%(+3.40)#981.9%(+3.63)#1,138
4.900285.4%2.1%(+3.25)#1031.9%(+3.48)#1,211
5.900775.2%2.1%(+3.10)#1161.9%(+3.33)#1,281
6.900684.1%2.1%(+1.98)#1881.9%(+2.20)#2,069
7.900663.9%2.1%(+1.81)#2021.9%(+2.04)#2,253
8.900383.7%2.1%(+1.61)#2201.9%(+1.83)#2,481
9.900363.6%2.1%(+1.53)#2351.9%(+1.75)#2,592
10.900253.6%2.1%(+1.47)#2451.9%(+1.69)#2,694
11.900143.5%2.1%(+1.40)#2581.9%(+1.62)#2,814
12.900463.5%2.1%(+1.39)#2591.9%(+1.62)#2,816
13.900413.2%2.1%(+1.05)#3281.9%(+1.27)#3,488
14.900153.1%2.1%(+1.01)#3341.9%(+1.23)#3,567
15.900483.1%2.1%(+0.998)#3351.9%(+1.23)#3,589
16.900453.1%2.1%(+0.976)#3391.9%(+1.20)#3,631
17.900353.0%2.1%(+0.902)#3581.9%(+1.13)#3,835
18.900342.9%2.1%(+0.809)#3801.9%(+1.04)#4,087
19.900642.8%2.1%(+0.645)#4071.9%(+0.873)#4,536
20.900432.8%2.1%(+0.641)#4081.9%(+0.869)#4,542
21.900172.8%2.1%(+0.634)#4141.9%(+0.862)#4,568
22.900612.6%2.1%(+0.513)#4611.9%(+0.740)#4,987
23.900272.6%2.1%(+0.480)#4671.9%(+0.708)#5,104
24.900082.6%2.1%(+0.438)#4851.9%(+0.665)#5,264
25.900042.4%2.1%(+0.317)#5241.9%(+0.545)#5,732
26.900402.3%2.1%(+0.210)#5651.9%(+0.438)#6,180
27.900102.3%2.1%(+0.189)#5741.9%(+0.417)#6,274
28.900242.3%2.1%(+0.188)#5751.9%(+0.416)#6,276
29.900062.3%2.1%(+0.178)#5781.9%(+0.405)#6,314
30.900052.3%2.1%(+0.149)#5871.9%(+0.376)#6,475
31.900202.3%2.1%(+0.135)#5921.9%(+0.362)#6,546
32.900442.2%2.1%(+0.107)#5981.9%(+0.335)#6,679
33.900262.2%2.1%(+0.040)#6221.9%(+0.268)#7,021
34.900072.1%2.1%(-0.020)#6491.9%(+0.207)#7,321
35.900182.1%2.1%(-0.021)#6501.9%(+0.207)#7,322
36.900192.1%2.1%(-0.040)#6621.9%(+0.187)#7,427
37.900422.1%2.1%(-0.063)#6781.9%(+0.164)#7,557
38.900651.9%2.1%(-0.205)#7341.9%(+0.023)#8,376
39.900371.9%2.1%(-0.239)#7541.9%(-0.011)#8,594
40.900391.8%2.1%(-0.283)#7781.9%(-0.056)#8,894
41.900121.8%2.1%(-0.367)#8221.9%(-0.139)#9,426
42.900571.7%2.1%(-0.418)#8521.9%(-0.190)#9,738
43.900161.7%2.1%(-0.445)#8661.9%(-0.217)#9,940
44.900621.6%2.1%(-0.493)#8921.9%(-0.266)#10,270
45.900561.5%2.1%(-0.572)#9261.9%(-0.345)#10,813
46.900471.4%2.1%(-0.749)#1,0041.9%(-0.521)#12,204
47.900291.3%2.1%(-0.783)#1,0151.9%(-0.555)#12,443
48.900311.3%2.1%(-0.861)#1,0641.9%(-0.634)#13,028
49.900211.3%2.1%(-0.864)#1,0651.9%(-0.636)#13,044
50.900021.1%2.1%(-1.04)#1,1331.9%(-0.816)#14,489
51.900331.1%2.1%(-1.07)#1,1451.9%(-0.838)#14,688
52.900591.0%2.1%(-1.11)#1,1611.9%(-0.879)#15,051
53.900220.99%2.1%(-1.13)#1,1681.9%(-0.898)#15,213
54.900230.96%2.1%(-1.16)#1,1851.9%(-0.935)#15,508
55.900110.94%2.1%(-1.18)#1,1891.9%(-0.950)#15,627
56.900010.93%2.1%(-1.19)#1,1921.9%(-0.961)#15,706
57.900030.86%2.1%(-1.25)#1,2101.9%(-1.03)#16,225
58.900320.85%2.1%(-1.27)#1,2171.9%(-1.05)#16,385
59.900630.76%2.1%(-1.36)#1,2461.9%(-1.14)#17,038

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
12.3%
#2
5.7%
#3
5.5%
#4
5.4%
#5
5.2%
#6
4.1%
#7
3.9%
#8
3.7%
#9
3.6%
#10
3.6%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles, CA?
90067 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles, CA with 12.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in Los Angeles is 2.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in California?
Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in California is 2.1%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Real Estate, Rental & Leasing in the United States is 1.9%.