Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles

100.0%
14.7%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 90077 14.7% 44.4% (-29.7)#137 35.2% (-20.5)#7,681
2. 90067 34.8% 44.4% (-9.53)#752 35.2% (-0.338)#23,672
3. 90056 42.2% 44.4% (-2.18)#1,001 35.2% (+7.01)#26,319
4. 90049 45.6% 44.4% (+1.19)#1,098 35.2% (+10.4)#27,171
5. 90032 46.0% 44.4% (+1.60)#1,106 35.2% (+10.8)#27,251
6. 90047 46.0% 44.4% (+1.62)#1,108 35.2% (+10.8)#27,258
7. 90040 46.6% 44.4% (+2.21)#1,129 35.2% (+11.4)#27,392
8. 90043 46.9% 44.4% (+2.55)#1,138 35.2% (+11.7)#27,450
9. 90041 47.8% 44.4% (+3.48)#1,168 35.2% (+12.7)#27,626
10. 90064 47.9% 44.4% (+3.55)#1,169 35.2% (+12.7)#27,641
11. 90045 52.1% 44.4% (+7.71)#1,258 35.2% (+16.9)#28,348
12. 90065 52.4% 44.4% (+8.07)#1,264 35.2% (+17.3)#28,393
13. 90062 52.8% 44.4% (+8.45)#1,269 35.2% (+17.6)#28,452
14. 90039 53.0% 44.4% (+8.65)#1,274 35.2% (+17.8)#28,487
15. 90068 53.6% 44.4% (+9.23)#1,285 35.2% (+18.4)#28,574
16. 90059 53.7% 44.4% (+9.28)#1,287 35.2% (+18.5)#28,584
17. 90042 55.0% 44.4% (+10.6)#1,314 35.2% (+19.8)#28,762
18. 90002 59.2% 44.4% (+14.8)#1,384 35.2% (+24.0)#29,219
19. 90061 59.6% 44.4% (+15.3)#1,391 35.2% (+24.5)#29,264
20. 90063 62.8% 44.4% (+18.5)#1,439 35.2% (+27.7)#29,538
21. 90066 63.3% 44.4% (+18.9)#1,443 35.2% (+28.1)#29,571
22. 90016 63.6% 44.4% (+19.2)#1,450 35.2% (+28.4)#29,604
23. 90001 65.2% 44.4% (+20.8)#1,472 35.2% (+30.0)#29,732
24. 90022 65.3% 44.4% (+21.0)#1,474 35.2% (+30.2)#29,744
25. 90024 66.7% 44.4% (+22.4)#1,496 35.2% (+31.6)#29,853
26. 90018 67.1% 44.4% (+22.8)#1,498 35.2% (+32.0)#29,871
27. 90031 67.2% 44.4% (+22.8)#1,500 35.2% (+32.0)#29,874
28. 90035 68.0% 44.4% (+23.6)#1,509 35.2% (+32.8)#29,920
29. 90008 68.5% 44.4% (+24.1)#1,516 35.2% (+33.3)#29,958
30. 90044 69.6% 44.4% (+25.2)#1,523 35.2% (+34.4)#30,020
31. 90048 71.1% 44.4% (+26.7)#1,540 35.2% (+35.9)#30,096
32. 90003 73.0% 44.4% (+28.6)#1,553 35.2% (+37.8)#30,187
33. 90011 73.3% 44.4% (+28.9)#1,555 35.2% (+38.1)#30,203
34. 90023 73.7% 44.4% (+29.3)#1,557 35.2% (+38.5)#30,220
35. 90037 74.9% 44.4% (+30.5)#1,563 35.2% (+39.7)#30,259
36. 90019 75.0% 44.4% (+30.6)#1,565 35.2% (+39.8)#30,263
37. 90025 75.3% 44.4% (+30.9)#1,568 35.2% (+40.1)#30,277
38. 90026 76.3% 44.4% (+31.9)#1,574 35.2% (+41.1)#30,310
39. 90046 78.4% 44.4% (+34.1)#1,584 35.2% (+43.3)#30,378
40. 90027 79.1% 44.4% (+34.7)#1,589 35.2% (+43.9)#30,403
41. 90034 79.7% 44.4% (+35.3)#1,594 35.2% (+44.5)#30,421
42. 90033 80.3% 44.4% (+35.9)#1,596 35.2% (+45.1)#30,436
43. 90010 83.5% 44.4% (+39.1)#1,609 35.2% (+48.3)#30,510
44. 90004 83.5% 44.4% (+39.2)#1,610 35.2% (+48.4)#30,515
45. 90036 85.2% 44.4% (+40.9)#1,617 35.2% (+50.1)#30,552
46. 90058 86.7% 44.4% (+42.3)#1,619 35.2% (+51.5)#30,577
47. 90029 88.4% 44.4% (+44.1)#1,622 35.2% (+53.2)#30,597
48. 90006 89.4% 44.4% (+45.0)#1,624 35.2% (+54.2)#30,619
49. 90007 89.4% 44.4% (+45.0)#1,625 35.2% (+54.2)#30,620
50. 90020 90.6% 44.4% (+46.2)#1,632 35.2% (+55.4)#30,649
51. 90015 91.4% 44.4% (+47.0)#1,634 35.2% (+56.2)#30,665
52. 90013 92.0% 44.4% (+47.6)#1,636 35.2% (+56.8)#30,676
53. 90038 92.1% 44.4% (+47.7)#1,637 35.2% (+56.9)#30,677
54. 90005 92.2% 44.4% (+47.8)#1,638 35.2% (+57.0)#30,679
55. 90021 93.1% 44.4% (+48.8)#1,640 35.2% (+58.0)#30,695
56. 90012 93.6% 44.4% (+49.2)#1,641 35.2% (+58.4)#30,701
57. 90017 94.6% 44.4% (+50.2)#1,644 35.2% (+59.4)#30,715
58. 90028 96.0% 44.4% (+51.6)#1,645 35.2% (+60.8)#30,729
59. 90014 96.5% 44.4% (+52.2)#1,647 35.2% (+61.3)#30,737
60. 90057 97.0% 44.4% (+52.6)#1,648 35.2% (+61.8)#30,746
61. 90089 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#1,655 35.2% (+64.8)#30,838

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
0.0%
#2
14.7%
#3
34.8%
#4
42.2%
#5
45.6%
#6
46.0%
#7
46.0%
#8
46.6%
#9
46.9%
#10
47.8%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
90077 has the Lowest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA with 14.7%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles is 63.4%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in California?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in California is 44.4%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.