Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Enterprise Management
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBuena ParkBurbankCarlsbadCastro ValleyChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaDanvilleDowneyDuarteEl CajonElk GroveEscondidoFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleHaywardHuntington BeachInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLakewoodLivermoreLodiLong BeachLos AngelesLos GatosMantecaMenifeeMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOxnardPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPleasantonRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan JoseSan LeandroSan MarcosSan MateoSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTracyValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles

0.0%
0.50%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.900640.45%0.13%(+0.321)#840.14%(+0.314)#1,593
2.900280.45%0.13%(+0.314)#910.14%(+0.307)#1,642
3.900630.42%0.13%(+0.286)#1000.14%(+0.278)#1,791
4.900240.38%0.13%(+0.252)#1150.14%(+0.244)#2,015
5.900130.32%0.13%(+0.188)#1490.14%(+0.181)#2,485
6.900310.27%0.13%(+0.141)#1730.14%(+0.134)#2,935
7.900190.25%0.13%(+0.116)#1960.14%(+0.109)#3,205
8.900360.23%0.13%(+0.098)#2140.14%(+0.091)#3,409
9.900180.22%0.13%(+0.093)#2190.14%(+0.086)#3,489
10.900340.20%0.13%(+0.069)#2540.14%(+0.062)#3,823
11.900410.20%0.13%(+0.065)#2580.14%(+0.058)#3,890
12.900460.18%0.13%(+0.048)#2840.14%(+0.041)#4,140
13.900060.18%0.13%(+0.047)#2860.14%(+0.040)#4,168
14.900590.18%0.13%(+0.046)#2880.14%(+0.039)#4,172
15.900020.17%0.13%(+0.037)#3060.14%(+0.030)#4,333
16.900490.17%0.13%(+0.035)#3140.14%(+0.028)#4,380
17.900150.15%0.13%(+0.021)#3310.14%(+0.013)#4,634
18.900010.13%0.13%(+0.001)#3700.14%(-0.006)#4,986
19.900290.13%0.13%(-0.006)#3830.14%(-0.013)#5,114
20.900470.13%0.13%(-0.006)#3840.14%(-0.013)#5,121
21.900660.12%0.13%(-0.009)#3920.14%(-0.017)#5,206
22.900110.12%0.13%(-0.013)#3990.14%(-0.020)#5,287
23.900270.11%0.13%(-0.025)#4370.14%(-0.033)#5,555
24.900480.10%0.13%(-0.029)#4440.14%(-0.036)#5,620
25.900050.096%0.13%(-0.036)#4650.14%(-0.043)#5,763
26.900680.089%0.13%(-0.043)#4930.14%(-0.050)#5,941
27.900650.086%0.13%(-0.046)#5030.14%(-0.053)#6,015
28.900320.085%0.13%(-0.046)#5060.14%(-0.053)#6,019
29.900430.084%0.13%(-0.048)#5110.14%(-0.055)#6,048
30.900610.083%0.13%(-0.048)#5120.14%(-0.055)#6,058
31.900450.082%0.13%(-0.049)#5160.14%(-0.056)#6,081
32.900420.069%0.13%(-0.063)#5480.14%(-0.070)#6,376
33.900350.069%0.13%(-0.063)#5490.14%(-0.070)#6,382
34.900570.066%0.13%(-0.065)#5600.14%(-0.072)#6,445
35.900440.064%0.13%(-0.068)#5680.14%(-0.075)#6,498
36.900390.056%0.13%(-0.075)#5940.14%(-0.083)#6,669
37.900220.056%0.13%(-0.076)#5960.14%(-0.083)#6,671
38.900370.055%0.13%(-0.076)#5990.14%(-0.083)#6,681
39.900040.053%0.13%(-0.078)#6050.14%(-0.085)#6,711
40.900250.053%0.13%(-0.078)#6070.14%(-0.085)#6,716
41.900330.050%0.13%(-0.082)#6120.14%(-0.089)#6,793
42.900160.028%0.13%(-0.103)#6590.14%(-0.110)#7,185
43.900260.022%0.13%(-0.110)#6760.14%(-0.117)#7,263
44.900230.016%0.13%(-0.115)#6820.14%(-0.122)#7,308
45.900080.012%0.13%(-0.119)#6880.14%(-0.126)#7,329

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
0.45%
#2
0.45%
#3
0.42%
#4
0.38%
#5
0.32%
#6
0.27%
#7
0.25%
#8
0.23%
#9
0.22%
#10
0.20%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles, CA?
90064 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles, CA with 0.45%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in Los Angeles is 0.12%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in California?
Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in California is 0.13%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Enterprise Management in the United States is 0.14%.