Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles

14.7%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 90089 100.0% 44.4% (+55.6)#4 35.2% (+64.8)#35
2. 90057 97.0% 44.4% (+52.6)#31 35.2% (+61.8)#356
3. 90014 96.5% 44.4% (+52.2)#32 35.2% (+61.3)#365
4. 90028 96.0% 44.4% (+51.6)#34 35.2% (+60.8)#373
5. 90017 94.6% 44.4% (+50.2)#35 35.2% (+59.4)#387
6. 90012 93.6% 44.4% (+49.2)#38 35.2% (+58.4)#401
7. 90021 93.1% 44.4% (+48.8)#39 35.2% (+58.0)#407
8. 90005 92.2% 44.4% (+47.8)#41 35.2% (+57.0)#423
9. 90038 92.1% 44.4% (+47.7)#42 35.2% (+56.9)#425
10. 90013 92.0% 44.4% (+47.6)#43 35.2% (+56.8)#426
11. 90015 91.4% 44.4% (+47.0)#45 35.2% (+56.2)#437
12. 90020 90.6% 44.4% (+46.2)#47 35.2% (+55.4)#453
13. 90007 89.4% 44.4% (+45.0)#54 35.2% (+54.2)#482
14. 90006 89.4% 44.4% (+45.0)#55 35.2% (+54.2)#483
15. 90029 88.4% 44.4% (+44.1)#57 35.2% (+53.2)#505
16. 90058 86.7% 44.4% (+42.3)#60 35.2% (+51.5)#525
17. 90036 85.2% 44.4% (+40.9)#62 35.2% (+50.1)#550
18. 90004 83.5% 44.4% (+39.2)#69 35.2% (+48.4)#587
19. 90010 83.5% 44.4% (+39.1)#70 35.2% (+48.3)#592
20. 90033 80.3% 44.4% (+35.9)#83 35.2% (+45.1)#666
21. 90034 79.7% 44.4% (+35.3)#85 35.2% (+44.5)#681
22. 90027 79.1% 44.4% (+34.7)#90 35.2% (+43.9)#699
23. 90046 78.4% 44.4% (+34.1)#95 35.2% (+43.3)#724
24. 90026 76.3% 44.4% (+31.9)#105 35.2% (+41.1)#792
25. 90025 75.3% 44.4% (+30.9)#111 35.2% (+40.1)#825
26. 90019 75.0% 44.4% (+30.6)#114 35.2% (+39.8)#839
27. 90037 74.9% 44.4% (+30.5)#116 35.2% (+39.7)#843
28. 90023 73.7% 44.4% (+29.3)#122 35.2% (+38.5)#882
29. 90011 73.3% 44.4% (+28.9)#124 35.2% (+38.1)#899
30. 90003 73.0% 44.4% (+28.6)#126 35.2% (+37.8)#915
31. 90048 71.1% 44.4% (+26.7)#139 35.2% (+35.9)#1,006
32. 90044 69.6% 44.4% (+25.2)#156 35.2% (+34.4)#1,082
33. 90008 68.5% 44.4% (+24.1)#163 35.2% (+33.3)#1,144
34. 90035 68.0% 44.4% (+23.6)#170 35.2% (+32.8)#1,182
35. 90031 67.2% 44.4% (+22.8)#179 35.2% (+32.0)#1,228
36. 90018 67.1% 44.4% (+22.8)#181 35.2% (+32.0)#1,231
37. 90024 66.7% 44.4% (+22.4)#183 35.2% (+31.6)#1,249
38. 90022 65.3% 44.4% (+21.0)#205 35.2% (+30.2)#1,358
39. 90001 65.2% 44.4% (+20.8)#207 35.2% (+30.0)#1,370
40. 90016 63.6% 44.4% (+19.2)#229 35.2% (+28.4)#1,498
41. 90066 63.3% 44.4% (+18.9)#236 35.2% (+28.1)#1,531
42. 90063 62.8% 44.4% (+18.5)#240 35.2% (+27.7)#1,564
43. 90061 59.6% 44.4% (+15.3)#288 35.2% (+24.5)#1,838
44. 90002 59.2% 44.4% (+14.8)#295 35.2% (+24.0)#1,883
45. 90042 55.0% 44.4% (+10.6)#365 35.2% (+19.8)#2,340
46. 90059 53.7% 44.4% (+9.28)#392 35.2% (+18.5)#2,518
47. 90068 53.6% 44.4% (+9.23)#394 35.2% (+18.4)#2,528
48. 90039 53.0% 44.4% (+8.65)#405 35.2% (+17.8)#2,615
49. 90062 52.8% 44.4% (+8.45)#410 35.2% (+17.6)#2,650
50. 90065 52.4% 44.4% (+8.07)#415 35.2% (+17.3)#2,709
51. 90045 52.1% 44.4% (+7.71)#421 35.2% (+16.9)#2,754
52. 90064 47.9% 44.4% (+3.55)#510 35.2% (+12.7)#3,461
53. 90041 47.8% 44.4% (+3.48)#511 35.2% (+12.7)#3,476
54. 90043 46.9% 44.4% (+2.55)#541 35.2% (+11.7)#3,652
55. 90040 46.6% 44.4% (+2.21)#550 35.2% (+11.4)#3,710
56. 90047 46.0% 44.4% (+1.62)#571 35.2% (+10.8)#3,844
57. 90032 46.0% 44.4% (+1.60)#573 35.2% (+10.8)#3,851
58. 90049 45.6% 44.4% (+1.19)#581 35.2% (+10.4)#3,931
59. 90056 42.2% 44.4% (-2.18)#678 35.2% (+7.01)#4,783
60. 90067 34.8% 44.4% (-9.53)#927 35.2% (-0.338)#7,430
61. 90077 14.7% 44.4% (-29.7)#1,542 35.2% (-20.5)#23,421

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
100.0%
#2
97.0%
#3
96.5%
#4
96.0%
#5
94.6%
#6
93.6%
#7
93.1%
#8
92.2%
#9
92.1%
#10
92.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
90089 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA with 100.0%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Los Angeles is 63.4%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in California?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in California is 44.4%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.