Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA
RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS
Lowest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Los Angeles
Compare Zip Codes
Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles
76.7%
2.4%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA
| Zip Code | Child Poverty (Girls) | vs State | vs National | |
| 1. | 90045 | 2.4% | 15.8% (-13.4)#86 | 17.0% (-14.5)#1,429 |
| 2. | 90049 | 2.6% | 15.8% (-13.2)#98 | 17.0% (-14.3)#1,613 |
| 3. | 90048 | 4.2% | 15.8% (-11.6)#180 | 17.0% (-12.8)#2,972 |
| 4. | 90046 | 4.9% | 15.8% (-10.9)#210 | 17.0% (-12.1)#3,588 |
| 5. | 90024 | 5.2% | 15.8% (-10.6)#229 | 17.0% (-11.8)#3,855 |
| 6. | 90066 | 5.7% | 15.8% (-10.1)#260 | 17.0% (-11.3)#4,329 |
| 7. | 90036 | 5.9% | 15.8% (-9.88)#269 | 17.0% (-11.0)#4,520 |
| 8. | 90035 | 6.4% | 15.8% (-9.44)#293 | 17.0% (-10.6)#4,884 |
| 9. | 90064 | 7.0% | 15.8% (-8.81)#330 | 17.0% (-9.98)#5,387 |
| 10. | 90034 | 7.2% | 15.8% (-8.60)#343 | 17.0% (-9.77)#5,563 |
| 11. | 90025 | 7.2% | 15.8% (-8.58)#346 | 17.0% (-9.75)#5,580 |
| 12. | 90039 | 8.6% | 15.8% (-7.22)#416 | 17.0% (-8.39)#6,735 |
| 13. | 90067 | 9.7% | 15.8% (-6.13)#478 | 17.0% (-7.30)#7,595 |
| 14. | 90077 | 10.1% | 15.8% (-5.71)#496 | 17.0% (-6.88)#7,935 |
| 15. | 90012 | 12.7% | 15.8% (-3.07)#612 | 17.0% (-4.24)#9,819 |
| 16. | 90014 | 12.9% | 15.8% (-2.86)#624 | 17.0% (-4.03)#9,962 |
| 17. | 90040 | 13.9% | 15.8% (-1.89)#665 | 17.0% (-3.06)#10,634 |
| 18. | 90042 | 15.5% | 15.8% (-0.301)#729 | 17.0% (-1.47)#11,698 |
| 19. | 90041 | 15.6% | 15.8% (-0.239)#731 | 17.0% (-1.41)#11,730 |
| 20. | 90028 | 16.0% | 15.8% (+0.164)#750 | 17.0% (-1.00)#11,977 |
| 21. | 90027 | 16.1% | 15.8% (+0.311)#751 | 17.0% (-0.857)#12,058 |
| 22. | 90056 | 17.1% | 15.8% (+1.29)#787 | 17.0% (+0.124)#12,650 |
| 23. | 90020 | 18.0% | 15.8% (+2.24)#814 | 17.0% (+1.07)#13,196 |
| 24. | 90065 | 18.8% | 15.8% (+2.94)#837 | 17.0% (+1.78)#13,623 |
| 25. | 90010 | 19.4% | 15.8% (+3.59)#857 | 17.0% (+2.43)#13,947 |
| 26. | 90043 | 20.8% | 15.8% (+4.98)#895 | 17.0% (+3.81)#14,650 |
| 27. | 90008 | 21.5% | 15.8% (+5.69)#911 | 17.0% (+4.52)#14,996 |
| 28. | 90062 | 21.9% | 15.8% (+6.14)#924 | 17.0% (+4.97)#15,208 |
| 29. | 90016 | 23.4% | 15.8% (+7.61)#960 | 17.0% (+6.45)#15,917 |
| 30. | 90022 | 24.2% | 15.8% (+8.35)#986 | 17.0% (+7.18)#16,218 |
| 31. | 90063 | 24.4% | 15.8% (+8.57)#993 | 17.0% (+7.41)#16,306 |
| 32. | 90019 | 24.4% | 15.8% (+8.63)#995 | 17.0% (+7.46)#16,332 |
| 33. | 90032 | 24.9% | 15.8% (+9.08)#1,003 | 17.0% (+7.92)#16,493 |
| 34. | 90038 | 25.2% | 15.8% (+9.38)#1,014 | 17.0% (+8.21)#16,658 |
| 35. | 90007 | 27.0% | 15.8% (+11.2)#1,049 | 17.0% (+10.0)#17,357 |
| 36. | 90031 | 27.6% | 15.8% (+11.8)#1,068 | 17.0% (+10.7)#17,596 |
| 37. | 90059 | 27.9% | 15.8% (+12.1)#1,072 | 17.0% (+10.9)#17,667 |
| 38. | 90004 | 28.1% | 15.8% (+12.3)#1,076 | 17.0% (+11.1)#17,734 |
| 39. | 90047 | 28.1% | 15.8% (+12.3)#1,077 | 17.0% (+11.1)#17,741 |
| 40. | 90061 | 30.9% | 15.8% (+15.1)#1,117 | 17.0% (+13.9)#18,616 |
| 41. | 90002 | 31.6% | 15.8% (+15.8)#1,127 | 17.0% (+14.6)#18,810 |
| 42. | 90006 | 32.6% | 15.8% (+16.8)#1,138 | 17.0% (+15.7)#19,108 |
| 43. | 90026 | 32.7% | 15.8% (+16.9)#1,139 | 17.0% (+15.7)#19,125 |
| 44. | 90044 | 32.9% | 15.8% (+17.1)#1,142 | 17.0% (+16.0)#19,192 |
| 45. | 90023 | 34.6% | 15.8% (+18.8)#1,165 | 17.0% (+17.6)#19,624 |
| 46. | 90037 | 35.2% | 15.8% (+19.4)#1,172 | 17.0% (+18.2)#19,767 |
| 47. | 90018 | 35.3% | 15.8% (+19.5)#1,174 | 17.0% (+18.3)#19,782 |
| 48. | 90001 | 35.5% | 15.8% (+19.7)#1,177 | 17.0% (+18.5)#19,831 |
| 49. | 90003 | 36.7% | 15.8% (+20.9)#1,186 | 17.0% (+19.7)#20,111 |
| 50. | 90029 | 36.9% | 15.8% (+21.1)#1,188 | 17.0% (+19.9)#20,154 |
| 51. | 90033 | 38.8% | 15.8% (+23.0)#1,205 | 17.0% (+21.8)#20,538 |
| 52. | 90011 | 39.8% | 15.8% (+23.9)#1,212 | 17.0% (+22.8)#20,689 |
| 53. | 90057 | 41.1% | 15.8% (+25.3)#1,219 | 17.0% (+24.1)#20,927 |
| 54. | 90005 | 43.4% | 15.8% (+27.6)#1,233 | 17.0% (+26.4)#21,279 |
| 55. | 90015 | 44.0% | 15.8% (+28.2)#1,236 | 17.0% (+27.0)#21,370 |
| 56. | 90058 | 44.4% | 15.8% (+28.6)#1,238 | 17.0% (+27.4)#21,427 |
| 57. | 90017 | 59.2% | 15.8% (+43.4)#1,280 | 17.0% (+42.2)#22,789 |
| 58. | 90021 | 76.7% | 15.8% (+60.9)#1,304 | 17.0% (+59.8)#23,443 |
1
Common Questions
What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA are:
What zip code has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA?
90045 has the Lowest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA with 2.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles, CA?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Los Angeles is 22.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in California is 15.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.