Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA
RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS
Highest Poverty | Single Female
Los Angeles
Compare Zip Codes
Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles
5.7%
48.6%
Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA
| Zip Code | Single Female Poverty | vs State | vs National | |
| 1. | 90017 | 48.6% | 20.3% (+28.3)#100 | 24.1% (+24.5)#3,727 |
| 2. | 90015 | 42.1% | 20.3% (+21.8)#142 | 24.1% (+18.1)#5,147 |
| 3. | 90077 | 41.3% | 20.3% (+21.0)#146 | 24.1% (+17.3)#5,374 |
| 4. | 90003 | 40.1% | 20.3% (+19.8)#160 | 24.1% (+16.0)#5,698 |
| 5. | 90058 | 38.8% | 20.3% (+18.5)#183 | 24.1% (+14.7)#6,144 |
| 6. | 90033 | 37.5% | 20.3% (+17.2)#195 | 24.1% (+13.5)#6,493 |
| 7. | 90011 | 35.3% | 20.3% (+15.0)#224 | 24.1% (+11.2)#7,292 |
| 8. | 90037 | 33.7% | 20.3% (+13.4)#251 | 24.1% (+9.65)#7,882 |
| 9. | 90061 | 32.6% | 20.3% (+12.3)#265 | 24.1% (+8.55)#8,410 |
| 10. | 90044 | 32.4% | 20.3% (+12.1)#269 | 24.1% (+8.30)#8,509 |
| 11. | 90006 | 32.1% | 20.3% (+11.8)#272 | 24.1% (+8.02)#8,625 |
| 12. | 90059 | 32.1% | 20.3% (+11.8)#274 | 24.1% (+7.99)#8,635 |
| 13. | 90012 | 31.8% | 20.3% (+11.5)#282 | 24.1% (+7.69)#8,769 |
| 14. | 90002 | 30.8% | 20.3% (+10.4)#297 | 24.1% (+6.67)#9,200 |
| 15. | 90023 | 30.0% | 20.3% (+9.71)#311 | 24.1% (+5.94)#9,487 |
| 16. | 90029 | 27.8% | 20.3% (+7.53)#365 | 24.1% (+3.76)#10,607 |
| 17. | 90040 | 27.3% | 20.3% (+6.97)#378 | 24.1% (+3.20)#10,891 |
| 18. | 90007 | 27.1% | 20.3% (+6.75)#383 | 24.1% (+2.98)#11,030 |
| 19. | 90005 | 26.9% | 20.3% (+6.59)#386 | 24.1% (+2.82)#11,104 |
| 20. | 90065 | 25.3% | 20.3% (+4.95)#436 | 24.1% (+1.18)#11,965 |
| 21. | 90001 | 24.9% | 20.3% (+4.63)#450 | 24.1% (+0.858)#12,222 |
| 22. | 90004 | 24.7% | 20.3% (+4.41)#455 | 24.1% (+0.643)#12,314 |
| 23. | 90008 | 24.7% | 20.3% (+4.35)#459 | 24.1% (+0.579)#12,353 |
| 24. | 90032 | 24.4% | 20.3% (+4.11)#466 | 24.1% (+0.339)#12,460 |
| 25. | 90019 | 23.9% | 20.3% (+3.58)#479 | 24.1% (-0.187)#12,744 |
| 26. | 90057 | 23.4% | 20.3% (+3.05)#493 | 24.1% (-0.722)#13,037 |
| 27. | 90026 | 23.3% | 20.3% (+2.96)#498 | 24.1% (-0.806)#13,092 |
| 28. | 90036 | 23.0% | 20.3% (+2.66)#507 | 24.1% (-1.11)#13,295 |
| 29. | 90016 | 22.8% | 20.3% (+2.51)#518 | 24.1% (-1.26)#13,373 |
| 30. | 90063 | 22.3% | 20.3% (+2.02)#535 | 24.1% (-1.75)#13,628 |
| 31. | 90047 | 22.2% | 20.3% (+1.91)#542 | 24.1% (-1.86)#13,743 |
| 32. | 90022 | 22.0% | 20.3% (+1.67)#552 | 24.1% (-2.10)#13,855 |
| 33. | 90031 | 21.5% | 20.3% (+1.24)#570 | 24.1% (-2.53)#14,085 |
| 34. | 90020 | 21.5% | 20.3% (+1.18)#573 | 24.1% (-2.59)#14,115 |
| 35. | 90048 | 20.9% | 20.3% (+0.546)#602 | 24.1% (-3.22)#14,455 |
| 36. | 90014 | 20.8% | 20.3% (+0.463)#606 | 24.1% (-3.31)#14,494 |
| 37. | 90018 | 20.7% | 20.3% (+0.398)#610 | 24.1% (-3.37)#14,532 |
| 38. | 90024 | 19.5% | 20.3% (-0.786)#654 | 24.1% (-4.56)#15,219 |
| 39. | 90062 | 19.2% | 20.3% (-1.07)#667 | 24.1% (-4.84)#15,376 |
| 40. | 90041 | 19.1% | 20.3% (-1.17)#673 | 24.1% (-4.94)#15,441 |
| 41. | 90021 | 18.5% | 20.3% (-1.79)#705 | 24.1% (-5.56)#15,778 |
| 42. | 90064 | 18.2% | 20.3% (-2.14)#721 | 24.1% (-5.91)#16,027 |
| 43. | 90042 | 17.5% | 20.3% (-2.82)#757 | 24.1% (-6.59)#16,418 |
| 44. | 90039 | 16.7% | 20.3% (-3.59)#787 | 24.1% (-7.36)#16,820 |
| 45. | 90038 | 16.6% | 20.3% (-3.75)#796 | 24.1% (-7.52)#16,993 |
| 46. | 90067 | 16.5% | 20.3% (-3.84)#798 | 24.1% (-7.61)#17,027 |
| 47. | 90043 | 15.8% | 20.3% (-4.51)#829 | 24.1% (-8.28)#17,387 |
| 48. | 90025 | 15.7% | 20.3% (-4.65)#840 | 24.1% (-8.42)#17,472 |
| 49. | 90035 | 13.8% | 20.3% (-6.51)#920 | 24.1% (-10.3)#18,552 |
| 50. | 90046 | 11.9% | 20.3% (-8.45)#1,018 | 24.1% (-12.2)#19,694 |
| 51. | 90049 | 11.5% | 20.3% (-8.80)#1,038 | 24.1% (-12.6)#19,912 |
| 52. | 90045 | 10.8% | 20.3% (-9.49)#1,076 | 24.1% (-13.3)#20,318 |
| 53. | 90027 | 10.1% | 20.3% (-10.2)#1,115 | 24.1% (-14.0)#20,696 |
| 54. | 90028 | 9.8% | 20.3% (-10.5)#1,125 | 24.1% (-14.2)#20,813 |
| 55. | 90066 | 9.6% | 20.3% (-10.7)#1,133 | 24.1% (-14.5)#20,943 |
| 56. | 90034 | 8.5% | 20.3% (-11.8)#1,189 | 24.1% (-15.6)#21,549 |
| 57. | 90056 | 5.7% | 20.3% (-14.6)#1,280 | 24.1% (-18.4)#22,866 |
1
Common Questions
What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA are:
What zip code has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA?
90017 has the Highest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA with 48.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles is 23.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in California?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in California is 20.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.