Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Drive | Carpool
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEdwardsEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa JollaLa MesaLa MiradaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLemooreLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoragaMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTracyTurlockTustinTwentynine PalmsUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles

24.2%
50.9%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Carpool vs State vs National
1. 90010 50.9% 39.3% (+11.6)#97 38.2% (+12.7)#2,500
2. 90043 50.2% 39.3% (+10.9)#108 38.2% (+12.0)#2,776
3. 90056 48.3% 39.3% (+9.00)#156 38.2% (+10.1)#3,666
4. 90077 48.3% 39.3% (+9.00)#157 38.2% (+10.1)#3,667
5. 90021 47.7% 39.3% (+8.40)#171 38.2% (+9.50)#3,988
6. 90064 46.9% 39.3% (+7.60)#197 38.2% (+8.70)#4,473
7. 90031 45.2% 39.3% (+5.90)#262 38.2% (+7.00)#5,691
8. 90048 44.3% 39.3% (+5.00)#309 38.2% (+6.10)#6,421
9. 90047 44.1% 39.3% (+4.80)#321 38.2% (+5.90)#6,588
10. 90041 43.7% 39.3% (+4.40)#344 38.2% (+5.50)#6,936
11. 90049 43.3% 39.3% (+4.00)#379 38.2% (+5.10)#7,343
12. 90008 43.1% 39.3% (+3.80)#394 38.2% (+4.90)#7,569
13. 90001 42.8% 39.3% (+3.50)#418 38.2% (+4.60)#7,846
14. 90018 42.5% 39.3% (+3.20)#437 38.2% (+4.30)#8,149
15. 90016 42.4% 39.3% (+3.10)#446 38.2% (+4.20)#8,310
16. 90065 42.1% 39.3% (+2.80)#466 38.2% (+3.90)#8,672
17. 90068 42.1% 39.3% (+2.80)#470 38.2% (+3.90)#8,701
18. 90004 41.9% 39.3% (+2.60)#487 38.2% (+3.70)#8,896
19. 90062 41.4% 39.3% (+2.10)#531 38.2% (+3.20)#9,534
20. 90020 40.9% 39.3% (+1.60)#578 38.2% (+2.70)#10,118
21. 90028 40.6% 39.3% (+1.30)#606 38.2% (+2.40)#10,508
22. 90036 40.2% 39.3% (+0.900)#656 38.2% (+2.00)#11,135
23. 90006 40.1% 39.3% (+0.800)#671 38.2% (+1.90)#11,222
24. 90040 39.9% 39.3% (+0.600)#708 38.2% (+1.70)#11,567
25. 90057 39.8% 39.3% (+0.500)#715 38.2% (+1.60)#11,647
26. 90046 39.3% 39.3% (=0.000)#764 38.2% (+1.10)#12,389
27. 90039 39.1% 39.3% (-0.200)#791 38.2% (+0.900)#12,708
28. 90026 38.6% 39.3% (-0.700)#842 38.2% (+0.400)#13,380
29. 90019 38.3% 39.3% (-1.00)#878 38.2% (+0.100)#13,841
30. 90061 38.2% 39.3% (-1.10)#887 38.2% (=0.000)#14,017
31. 90017 38.1% 39.3% (-1.20)#902 38.2% (-0.100)#14,149
32. 90035 38.0% 39.3% (-1.30)#910 38.2% (-0.200)#14,281
33. 90022 37.8% 39.3% (-1.50)#924 38.2% (-0.400)#14,495
34. 90037 37.7% 39.3% (-1.60)#938 38.2% (-0.500)#14,681
35. 90007 37.7% 39.3% (-1.60)#940 38.2% (-0.500)#14,702
36. 90015 37.7% 39.3% (-1.60)#943 38.2% (-0.500)#14,728
37. 90044 37.5% 39.3% (-1.80)#959 38.2% (-0.700)#14,955
38. 90034 37.5% 39.3% (-1.80)#960 38.2% (-0.700)#14,963
39. 90011 37.3% 39.3% (-2.00)#982 38.2% (-0.900)#15,300
40. 90032 37.3% 39.3% (-2.00)#984 38.2% (-0.900)#15,313
41. 90023 36.9% 39.3% (-2.40)#1,011 38.2% (-1.30)#15,838
42. 90003 36.6% 39.3% (-2.70)#1,032 38.2% (-1.60)#16,268
43. 90029 36.6% 39.3% (-2.70)#1,040 38.2% (-1.60)#16,288
44. 90033 36.3% 39.3% (-3.00)#1,059 38.2% (-1.90)#16,714
45. 90063 36.0% 39.3% (-3.30)#1,077 38.2% (-2.20)#17,080
46. 90042 35.8% 39.3% (-3.50)#1,088 38.2% (-2.40)#17,351
47. 90059 35.8% 39.3% (-3.50)#1,090 38.2% (-2.40)#17,378
48. 90025 35.4% 39.3% (-3.90)#1,125 38.2% (-2.80)#17,973
49. 90066 35.2% 39.3% (-4.10)#1,136 38.2% (-3.00)#18,232
50. 90002 34.7% 39.3% (-4.60)#1,163 38.2% (-3.50)#18,791
51. 90024 34.1% 39.3% (-5.20)#1,185 38.2% (-4.10)#19,478
52. 90027 33.8% 39.3% (-5.50)#1,198 38.2% (-4.40)#19,732
53. 90005 33.7% 39.3% (-5.60)#1,206 38.2% (-4.50)#19,866
54. 90045 32.9% 39.3% (-6.40)#1,233 38.2% (-5.30)#20,586
55. 90013 32.4% 39.3% (-6.90)#1,255 38.2% (-5.80)#21,130
56. 90038 31.9% 39.3% (-7.40)#1,268 38.2% (-6.30)#21,453
57. 90012 31.3% 39.3% (-8.00)#1,283 38.2% (-6.90)#21,910
58. 90058 31.3% 39.3% (-8.00)#1,285 38.2% (-6.90)#21,944
59. 90014 29.2% 39.3% (-10.1)#1,317 38.2% (-9.00)#23,144
60. 90089 24.2% 39.3% (-15.1)#1,362 38.2% (-14.0)#24,722

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
50.9%
#2
50.2%
#3
48.3%
#4
48.3%
#5
47.7%
#6
46.9%
#7
45.2%
#8
44.3%
#9
44.1%
#10
43.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles, CA?
90010 has the Highest Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles, CA with 50.9%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in Los Angeles is 39.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in California?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in California is 39.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Carpooling to Work in the United States is 38.2%.