Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles

100.0%
3.0%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 90057 3.0% 55.6% (-52.6)#4 64.8% (-61.8)#58
2. 90014 3.5% 55.6% (-52.2)#5 64.8% (-61.3)#67
3. 90028 4.0% 55.6% (-51.6)#7 64.8% (-60.8)#75
4. 90017 5.4% 55.6% (-50.2)#8 64.8% (-59.4)#89
5. 90012 6.4% 55.6% (-49.2)#11 64.8% (-58.4)#103
6. 90021 6.9% 55.6% (-48.8)#12 64.8% (-58.0)#109
7. 90005 7.8% 55.6% (-47.8)#14 64.8% (-57.0)#125
8. 90038 7.9% 55.6% (-47.7)#15 64.8% (-56.9)#127
9. 90013 8.0% 55.6% (-47.6)#16 64.8% (-56.8)#128
10. 90015 8.6% 55.6% (-47.0)#18 64.8% (-56.2)#139
11. 90020 9.4% 55.6% (-46.2)#20 64.8% (-55.4)#155
12. 90007 10.6% 55.6% (-45.0)#27 64.8% (-54.2)#184
13. 90006 10.6% 55.6% (-45.0)#28 64.8% (-54.2)#185
14. 90029 11.6% 55.6% (-44.1)#30 64.8% (-53.2)#207
15. 90058 13.3% 55.6% (-42.3)#33 64.8% (-51.5)#227
16. 90036 14.8% 55.6% (-40.9)#35 64.8% (-50.1)#252
17. 90004 16.5% 55.6% (-39.2)#42 64.8% (-48.4)#289
18. 90010 16.5% 55.6% (-39.1)#43 64.8% (-48.3)#294
19. 90033 19.7% 55.6% (-35.9)#56 64.8% (-45.1)#368
20. 90034 20.3% 55.6% (-35.3)#58 64.8% (-44.5)#383
21. 90027 20.9% 55.6% (-34.7)#63 64.8% (-43.9)#401
22. 90046 21.6% 55.6% (-34.1)#68 64.8% (-43.3)#426
23. 90026 23.7% 55.6% (-31.9)#78 64.8% (-41.1)#494
24. 90025 24.7% 55.6% (-30.9)#84 64.8% (-40.1)#527
25. 90019 25.0% 55.6% (-30.6)#87 64.8% (-39.8)#541
26. 90037 25.1% 55.6% (-30.5)#89 64.8% (-39.7)#545
27. 90023 26.3% 55.6% (-29.3)#95 64.8% (-38.5)#584
28. 90011 26.7% 55.6% (-28.9)#97 64.8% (-38.1)#601
29. 90003 27.0% 55.6% (-28.6)#99 64.8% (-37.8)#617
30. 90048 28.9% 55.6% (-26.7)#112 64.8% (-35.9)#708
31. 90044 30.4% 55.6% (-25.2)#129 64.8% (-34.4)#784
32. 90008 31.5% 55.6% (-24.1)#136 64.8% (-33.3)#846
33. 90035 32.0% 55.6% (-23.6)#143 64.8% (-32.8)#884
34. 90031 32.8% 55.6% (-22.8)#152 64.8% (-32.0)#930
35. 90018 32.9% 55.6% (-22.8)#154 64.8% (-32.0)#933
36. 90024 33.3% 55.6% (-22.4)#156 64.8% (-31.6)#951
37. 90022 34.7% 55.6% (-21.0)#178 64.8% (-30.2)#1,060
38. 90001 34.8% 55.6% (-20.8)#180 64.8% (-30.0)#1,072
39. 90016 36.4% 55.6% (-19.2)#202 64.8% (-28.4)#1,200
40. 90066 36.7% 55.6% (-18.9)#209 64.8% (-28.1)#1,233
41. 90063 37.2% 55.6% (-18.5)#213 64.8% (-27.7)#1,266
42. 90061 40.4% 55.6% (-15.3)#261 64.8% (-24.5)#1,540
43. 90002 40.8% 55.6% (-14.8)#268 64.8% (-24.0)#1,585
44. 90042 45.0% 55.6% (-10.6)#338 64.8% (-19.8)#2,042
45. 90059 46.3% 55.6% (-9.28)#365 64.8% (-18.5)#2,220
46. 90068 46.4% 55.6% (-9.23)#367 64.8% (-18.4)#2,230
47. 90039 47.0% 55.6% (-8.65)#378 64.8% (-17.8)#2,317
48. 90062 47.2% 55.6% (-8.45)#383 64.8% (-17.6)#2,352
49. 90065 47.6% 55.6% (-8.07)#388 64.8% (-17.3)#2,411
50. 90045 47.9% 55.6% (-7.71)#394 64.8% (-16.9)#2,456
51. 90064 52.1% 55.6% (-3.55)#483 64.8% (-12.7)#3,163
52. 90041 52.2% 55.6% (-3.48)#484 64.8% (-12.7)#3,178
53. 90043 53.1% 55.6% (-2.55)#514 64.8% (-11.7)#3,354
54. 90040 53.4% 55.6% (-2.21)#523 64.8% (-11.4)#3,412
55. 90047 54.0% 55.6% (-1.62)#544 64.8% (-10.8)#3,546
56. 90032 54.0% 55.6% (-1.60)#546 64.8% (-10.8)#3,553
57. 90049 54.4% 55.6% (-1.19)#554 64.8% (-10.4)#3,633
58. 90056 57.8% 55.6% (+2.18)#651 64.8% (-7.01)#4,485
59. 90067 65.2% 55.6% (+9.53)#900 64.8% (+0.338)#7,132
60. 90077 85.3% 55.6% (+29.7)#1,515 64.8% (+20.5)#23,123
61. 90071 100.0% 55.6% (+44.4)#1,659 64.8% (+35.2)#31,161

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
0.0%
#2
3.0%
#3
3.5%
#4
4.0%
#5
5.4%
#6
6.4%
#7
6.9%
#8
7.8%
#9
7.9%
#10
8.0%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
90057 has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA with 3.0%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Los Angeles is 36.6%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in California is 55.6%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.