Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Construction
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinTwentynine PalmsUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles

0.0%
15.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed vs State vs National
1.9005712.3%6.7%(+5.56)#2136.9%(+5.38)#5,263
2.9006311.3%6.7%(+4.59)#2646.9%(+4.40)#6,542
3.9000311.1%6.7%(+4.42)#2746.9%(+4.23)#6,808
4.9000610.9%6.7%(+4.17)#2966.9%(+3.99)#7,167
5.9002310.6%6.7%(+3.92)#3116.9%(+3.73)#7,536
6.900339.9%6.7%(+3.24)#3646.9%(+3.05)#8,696
7.900379.8%6.7%(+3.10)#3796.9%(+2.92)#8,935
8.900229.7%6.7%(+3.01)#3856.9%(+2.83)#9,099
9.900119.7%6.7%(+2.97)#3896.9%(+2.78)#9,194
10.900029.5%6.7%(+2.83)#4046.9%(+2.64)#9,484
11.900019.3%6.7%(+2.66)#4296.9%(+2.47)#9,840
12.900628.7%6.7%(+2.00)#5226.9%(+1.82)#11,266
13.900447.9%6.7%(+1.18)#6266.9%(+0.992)#13,319
14.900387.6%6.7%(+0.923)#6726.9%(+0.738)#14,008
15.900327.5%6.7%(+0.760)#6956.9%(+0.575)#14,473
16.900057.4%6.7%(+0.727)#7016.9%(+0.542)#14,563
17.900427.4%6.7%(+0.693)#7066.9%(+0.508)#14,659
18.900407.2%6.7%(+0.546)#7336.9%(+0.361)#15,068
19.900597.0%6.7%(+0.359)#7596.9%(+0.174)#15,578
20.900477.0%6.7%(+0.288)#7746.9%(+0.103)#15,813
21.900046.9%6.7%(+0.180)#7926.9%(-0.005)#16,142
22.900166.7%6.7%(-0.017)#8236.9%(-0.202)#16,754
23.900176.6%6.7%(-0.095)#8376.9%(-0.280)#17,006
24.900566.5%6.7%(-0.147)#8486.9%(-0.332)#17,172
25.900186.5%6.7%(-0.211)#8586.9%(-0.396)#17,360
26.900616.3%6.7%(-0.403)#8866.9%(-0.588)#17,989
27.900196.2%6.7%(-0.538)#9196.9%(-0.723)#18,431
28.900076.0%6.7%(-0.673)#9476.9%(-0.858)#18,875
29.900655.9%6.7%(-0.776)#9606.9%(-0.961)#19,173
30.900295.8%6.7%(-0.864)#9726.9%(-1.05)#19,447
31.900315.6%6.7%(-1.06)#1,0106.9%(-1.24)#20,027
32.900775.1%6.7%(-1.56)#1,0736.9%(-1.74)#21,510
33.900415.0%6.7%(-1.74)#1,1016.9%(-1.93)#22,070
34.900434.7%6.7%(-1.95)#1,1326.9%(-2.14)#22,718
35.900584.6%6.7%(-2.10)#1,1606.9%(-2.28)#23,105
36.900204.4%6.7%(-2.27)#1,1886.9%(-2.45)#23,628
37.900154.2%6.7%(-2.53)#1,2256.9%(-2.71)#24,347
38.900264.1%6.7%(-2.61)#1,2346.9%(-2.80)#24,550
39.900213.9%6.7%(-2.78)#1,2696.9%(-2.96)#24,951
40.900393.5%6.7%(-3.19)#1,3216.9%(-3.38)#25,884
41.900663.2%6.7%(-3.46)#1,3546.9%(-3.64)#26,420
42.900083.0%6.7%(-3.65)#1,3806.9%(-3.84)#26,802
43.900253.0%6.7%(-3.67)#1,3846.9%(-3.86)#26,847
44.900122.9%6.7%(-3.81)#1,4046.9%(-4.00)#27,122
45.900342.8%6.7%(-3.85)#1,4086.9%(-4.03)#27,172
46.900452.8%6.7%(-3.86)#1,4106.9%(-4.04)#27,191
47.900282.8%6.7%(-3.90)#1,4136.9%(-4.08)#27,252
48.900352.6%6.7%(-4.10)#1,4296.9%(-4.28)#27,570
49.900132.6%6.7%(-4.10)#1,4306.9%(-4.29)#27,577
50.900672.5%6.7%(-4.20)#1,4436.9%(-4.38)#27,722
51.900642.3%6.7%(-4.44)#1,4686.9%(-4.62)#28,045
52.900272.3%6.7%(-4.44)#1,4706.9%(-4.62)#28,048
53.900481.8%6.7%(-4.86)#1,5046.9%(-5.04)#28,530
54.900681.7%6.7%(-4.96)#1,5136.9%(-5.15)#28,635
55.900361.6%6.7%(-5.04)#1,5216.9%(-5.23)#28,715
56.900461.5%6.7%(-5.22)#1,5336.9%(-5.40)#28,870
57.900101.5%6.7%(-5.24)#1,5346.9%(-5.42)#28,889
58.900141.4%6.7%(-5.26)#1,5356.9%(-5.45)#28,916
59.900241.3%6.7%(-5.35)#1,5406.9%(-5.54)#28,994
60.900491.3%6.7%(-5.36)#1,5426.9%(-5.55)#29,008

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
12.3%
#2
11.3%
#3
11.1%
#4
10.9%
#5
10.6%
#6
9.9%
#7
9.8%
#8
9.7%
#9
9.7%
#10
9.5%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles, CA?
90057 has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles, CA with 12.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in Los Angeles is 6.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in California?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in California is 6.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Construction in the United States is 6.9%.