Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Family Income | $100k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles

12.4%
81.2%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code Families with Income > $100k vs State vs National
1. 90049 81.2% 52.2% (+29.0)#100 46.1% (+35.1)#898
2. 90077 79.5% 52.2% (+27.3)#122 46.1% (+33.4)#1,085
3. 90045 76.3% 52.2% (+24.1)#170 46.1% (+30.2)#1,498
4. 90056 74.2% 52.2% (+22.0)#211 46.1% (+28.1)#1,843
5. 90067 72.7% 52.2% (+20.5)#250 46.1% (+26.6)#2,105
6. 90048 72.6% 52.2% (+20.4)#252 46.1% (+26.5)#2,118
7. 90064 72.4% 52.2% (+20.2)#255 46.1% (+26.3)#2,153
8. 90068 71.0% 52.2% (+18.8)#292 46.1% (+24.9)#2,407
9. 90024 64.9% 52.2% (+12.7)#455 46.1% (+18.8)#3,757
10. 90041 64.4% 52.2% (+12.2)#477 46.1% (+18.3)#3,898
11. 90039 63.0% 52.2% (+10.8)#512 46.1% (+16.9)#4,278
12. 90025 62.5% 52.2% (+10.3)#524 46.1% (+16.4)#4,407
13. 90036 62.2% 52.2% (+10.00)#529 46.1% (+16.1)#4,487
14. 90035 61.8% 52.2% (+9.60)#541 46.1% (+15.7)#4,599
15. 90066 61.3% 52.2% (+9.10)#547 46.1% (+15.2)#4,737
16. 90013 57.8% 52.2% (+5.60)#635 46.1% (+11.7)#5,841
17. 90046 54.8% 52.2% (+2.60)#713 46.1% (+8.70)#6,867
18. 90034 54.7% 52.2% (+2.50)#715 46.1% (+8.60)#6,905
19. 90014 53.9% 52.2% (+1.70)#737 46.1% (+7.80)#7,199
20. 90027 53.8% 52.2% (+1.60)#741 46.1% (+7.70)#7,230
21. 90042 48.0% 52.2% (-4.20)#871 46.1% (+1.90)#9,730
22. 90065 48.0% 52.2% (-4.20)#872 46.1% (+1.90)#9,734
23. 90043 45.7% 52.2% (-6.50)#931 46.1% (-0.400)#10,972
24. 90010 42.6% 52.2% (-9.60)#1,028 46.1% (-3.50)#12,763
25. 90026 41.5% 52.2% (-10.7)#1,053 46.1% (-4.60)#13,393
26. 90032 39.7% 52.2% (-12.5)#1,102 46.1% (-6.40)#14,596
27. 90019 39.5% 52.2% (-12.7)#1,106 46.1% (-6.60)#14,722
28. 90016 39.3% 52.2% (-12.9)#1,113 46.1% (-6.80)#14,856
29. 90008 38.0% 52.2% (-14.2)#1,154 46.1% (-8.10)#15,743
30. 90047 37.1% 52.2% (-15.1)#1,174 46.1% (-9.00)#16,425
31. 90040 34.9% 52.2% (-17.3)#1,230 46.1% (-11.2)#17,967
32. 90012 33.7% 52.2% (-18.5)#1,258 46.1% (-12.4)#18,772
33. 90018 33.1% 52.2% (-19.1)#1,275 46.1% (-13.0)#19,219
34. 90004 32.8% 52.2% (-19.4)#1,284 46.1% (-13.3)#19,425
35. 90029 31.9% 52.2% (-20.3)#1,303 46.1% (-14.2)#20,089
36. 90062 31.9% 52.2% (-20.3)#1,304 46.1% (-14.2)#20,090
37. 90028 31.4% 52.2% (-20.8)#1,313 46.1% (-14.7)#20,412
38. 90063 31.3% 52.2% (-20.9)#1,315 46.1% (-14.8)#20,478
39. 90022 30.0% 52.2% (-22.2)#1,344 46.1% (-16.1)#21,395
40. 90005 29.7% 52.2% (-22.5)#1,350 46.1% (-16.4)#21,619
41. 90031 29.6% 52.2% (-22.6)#1,353 46.1% (-16.5)#21,700
42. 90015 28.7% 52.2% (-23.5)#1,378 46.1% (-17.4)#22,308
43. 90061 28.4% 52.2% (-23.8)#1,382 46.1% (-17.7)#22,508
44. 90020 27.6% 52.2% (-24.6)#1,393 46.1% (-18.5)#23,032
45. 90038 27.6% 52.2% (-24.6)#1,395 46.1% (-18.5)#23,034
46. 90059 25.2% 52.2% (-27.0)#1,451 46.1% (-20.9)#24,587
47. 90044 24.9% 52.2% (-27.3)#1,457 46.1% (-21.2)#24,770
48. 90037 23.3% 52.2% (-28.9)#1,480 46.1% (-22.8)#25,645
49. 90033 23.1% 52.2% (-29.1)#1,485 46.1% (-23.0)#25,735
50. 90007 22.1% 52.2% (-30.1)#1,497 46.1% (-24.0)#26,242
51. 90002 20.0% 52.2% (-32.2)#1,520 46.1% (-26.1)#27,214
52. 90001 19.9% 52.2% (-32.3)#1,523 46.1% (-26.2)#27,284
53. 90003 19.6% 52.2% (-32.6)#1,525 46.1% (-26.5)#27,408
54. 90017 19.3% 52.2% (-32.9)#1,529 46.1% (-26.8)#27,556
55. 90011 18.5% 52.2% (-33.7)#1,546 46.1% (-27.6)#27,885
56. 90058 16.5% 52.2% (-35.7)#1,576 46.1% (-29.6)#28,640
57. 90023 16.3% 52.2% (-35.9)#1,578 46.1% (-29.8)#28,689
58. 90006 15.2% 52.2% (-37.0)#1,588 46.1% (-30.9)#29,031
59. 90057 14.8% 52.2% (-37.4)#1,593 46.1% (-31.3)#29,167
60. 90021 12.4% 52.2% (-39.8)#1,610 46.1% (-33.7)#29,864

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
81.2%
#2
79.5%
#3
76.3%
#4
74.2%
#5
72.7%
#6
72.6%
#7
72.4%
#8
71.0%
#9
64.9%
#10
64.4%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA?
90049 has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA with 81.2%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles is 44.0%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in California?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in California is 52.2%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in the United States is 46.1%.