Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Family Income | $100k+
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles

0.0%
100.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code Families with Income > $100k vs State vs National
1.9004981.2%52.2%(+29.0)#10046.1%(+35.1)#898
2.9007779.5%52.2%(+27.3)#12246.1%(+33.4)#1,085
3.9004576.3%52.2%(+24.1)#17046.1%(+30.2)#1,498
4.9005674.2%52.2%(+22.0)#21146.1%(+28.1)#1,843
5.9006772.7%52.2%(+20.5)#25046.1%(+26.6)#2,105
6.9004872.6%52.2%(+20.4)#25246.1%(+26.5)#2,118
7.9006472.4%52.2%(+20.2)#25546.1%(+26.3)#2,153
8.9006871.0%52.2%(+18.8)#29246.1%(+24.9)#2,407
9.9002464.9%52.2%(+12.7)#45546.1%(+18.8)#3,757
10.9004164.4%52.2%(+12.2)#47746.1%(+18.3)#3,898
11.9003963.0%52.2%(+10.8)#51246.1%(+16.9)#4,278
12.9002562.5%52.2%(+10.3)#52446.1%(+16.4)#4,407
13.9003662.2%52.2%(+10.00)#52946.1%(+16.1)#4,487
14.9003561.8%52.2%(+9.60)#54146.1%(+15.7)#4,599
15.9006661.3%52.2%(+9.10)#54746.1%(+15.2)#4,737
16.9001357.8%52.2%(+5.60)#63546.1%(+11.7)#5,841
17.9004654.8%52.2%(+2.60)#71346.1%(+8.70)#6,867
18.9003454.7%52.2%(+2.50)#71546.1%(+8.60)#6,905
19.9001453.9%52.2%(+1.70)#73746.1%(+7.80)#7,199
20.9002753.8%52.2%(+1.60)#74146.1%(+7.70)#7,230
21.9004248.0%52.2%(-4.20)#87146.1%(+1.90)#9,730
22.9006548.0%52.2%(-4.20)#87246.1%(+1.90)#9,734
23.9004345.7%52.2%(-6.50)#93146.1%(-0.400)#10,972
24.9001042.6%52.2%(-9.60)#1,02846.1%(-3.50)#12,763
25.9002641.5%52.2%(-10.7)#1,05346.1%(-4.60)#13,393
26.9003239.7%52.2%(-12.5)#1,10246.1%(-6.40)#14,596
27.9001939.5%52.2%(-12.7)#1,10646.1%(-6.60)#14,722
28.9001639.3%52.2%(-12.9)#1,11346.1%(-6.80)#14,856
29.9000838.0%52.2%(-14.2)#1,15446.1%(-8.10)#15,743
30.9004737.1%52.2%(-15.1)#1,17446.1%(-9.00)#16,425
31.9004034.9%52.2%(-17.3)#1,23046.1%(-11.2)#17,967
32.9001233.7%52.2%(-18.5)#1,25846.1%(-12.4)#18,772
33.9001833.1%52.2%(-19.1)#1,27546.1%(-13.0)#19,219
34.9000432.8%52.2%(-19.4)#1,28446.1%(-13.3)#19,425
35.9002931.9%52.2%(-20.3)#1,30346.1%(-14.2)#20,089
36.9006231.9%52.2%(-20.3)#1,30446.1%(-14.2)#20,090
37.9002831.4%52.2%(-20.8)#1,31346.1%(-14.7)#20,412
38.9006331.3%52.2%(-20.9)#1,31546.1%(-14.8)#20,478
39.9002230.0%52.2%(-22.2)#1,34446.1%(-16.1)#21,395
40.9000529.7%52.2%(-22.5)#1,35046.1%(-16.4)#21,619
41.9003129.6%52.2%(-22.6)#1,35346.1%(-16.5)#21,700
42.9001528.7%52.2%(-23.5)#1,37846.1%(-17.4)#22,308
43.9006128.4%52.2%(-23.8)#1,38246.1%(-17.7)#22,508
44.9002027.6%52.2%(-24.6)#1,39346.1%(-18.5)#23,032
45.9003827.6%52.2%(-24.6)#1,39546.1%(-18.5)#23,034
46.9005925.2%52.2%(-27.0)#1,45146.1%(-20.9)#24,587
47.9004424.9%52.2%(-27.3)#1,45746.1%(-21.2)#24,770
48.9003723.3%52.2%(-28.9)#1,48046.1%(-22.8)#25,645
49.9003323.1%52.2%(-29.1)#1,48546.1%(-23.0)#25,735
50.9000722.1%52.2%(-30.1)#1,49746.1%(-24.0)#26,242
51.9000220.0%52.2%(-32.2)#1,52046.1%(-26.1)#27,214
52.9000119.9%52.2%(-32.3)#1,52346.1%(-26.2)#27,284
53.9000319.6%52.2%(-32.6)#1,52546.1%(-26.5)#27,408
54.9001719.3%52.2%(-32.9)#1,52946.1%(-26.8)#27,556
55.9001118.5%52.2%(-33.7)#1,54646.1%(-27.6)#27,885
56.9005816.5%52.2%(-35.7)#1,57646.1%(-29.6)#28,640
57.9002316.3%52.2%(-35.9)#1,57846.1%(-29.8)#28,689
58.9000615.2%52.2%(-37.0)#1,58846.1%(-30.9)#29,031
59.9005714.8%52.2%(-37.4)#1,59346.1%(-31.3)#29,167
60.9002112.4%52.2%(-39.8)#1,61046.1%(-33.7)#29,864

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
81.2%
#2
79.5%
#3
76.3%
#4
74.2%
#5
72.7%
#6
72.6%
#7
72.4%
#8
71.0%
#9
64.9%
#10
64.4%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA?
90049 has the Highest Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA with 81.2%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in Los Angeles is 44.0%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in California?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in California is 52.2%.
What is the Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in the United States?
Percentage of Families with Income Above $100,000 in the United States is 46.1%.