Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Private Company Employees
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa JollaLa MesaLa MiradaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMontereyMonterey ParkMoragaMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinTwentynine PalmsUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles

27.6%
77.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Private Company Employees vs State vs National
1. 90003 77.0% 66.5% (+10.5)#169 66.9% (+10.1)#3,559
2. 90059 76.8% 66.5% (+10.3)#175 66.9% (+9.88)#3,710
3. 90011 76.5% 66.5% (+9.98)#186 66.9% (+9.56)#3,888
4. 90001 75.6% 66.5% (+9.16)#215 66.9% (+8.75)#4,411
5. 90073 75.3% 66.5% (+8.78)#233 66.9% (+8.37)#4,710
6. 90002 75.1% 66.5% (+8.67)#236 66.9% (+8.25)#4,802
7. 90010 74.9% 66.5% (+8.38)#244 66.9% (+7.96)#5,026
8. 90063 73.9% 66.5% (+7.45)#268 66.9% (+7.03)#5,840
9. 90015 73.5% 66.5% (+7.07)#283 66.9% (+6.65)#6,196
10. 90022 72.8% 66.5% (+6.36)#309 66.9% (+5.95)#6,909
11. 90061 72.6% 66.5% (+6.15)#320 66.9% (+5.74)#7,146
12. 90023 72.0% 66.5% (+5.49)#351 66.9% (+5.08)#7,865
13. 90044 72.0% 66.5% (+5.48)#353 66.9% (+5.07)#7,874
14. 90038 71.9% 66.5% (+5.42)#357 66.9% (+5.00)#7,939
15. 90037 71.7% 66.5% (+5.23)#362 66.9% (+4.82)#8,157
16. 90033 71.3% 66.5% (+4.81)#397 66.9% (+4.40)#8,702
17. 90006 71.1% 66.5% (+4.58)#410 66.9% (+4.17)#8,975
18. 90028 71.0% 66.5% (+4.52)#416 66.9% (+4.11)#9,049
19. 90040 70.6% 66.5% (+4.14)#437 66.9% (+3.73)#9,550
20. 90021 70.3% 66.5% (+3.81)#464 66.9% (+3.39)#9,979
21. 90020 69.7% 66.5% (+3.25)#495 66.9% (+2.83)#10,727
22. 90016 69.7% 66.5% (+3.24)#496 66.9% (+2.83)#10,735
23. 90014 69.6% 66.5% (+3.14)#501 66.9% (+2.73)#10,872
24. 90034 68.5% 66.5% (+2.00)#568 66.9% (+1.59)#12,373
25. 90005 68.3% 66.5% (+1.80)#579 66.9% (+1.39)#12,682
26. 90025 68.0% 66.5% (+1.53)#599 66.9% (+1.12)#13,050
27. 90017 67.8% 66.5% (+1.28)#624 66.9% (+0.867)#13,400
28. 90004 67.2% 66.5% (+0.680)#659 66.9% (+0.266)#14,178
29. 90019 66.8% 66.5% (+0.316)#685 66.9% (-0.097)#14,625
30. 90029 66.6% 66.5% (+0.127)#701 66.9% (-0.287)#14,906
31. 90026 66.2% 66.5% (-0.284)#733 66.9% (-0.697)#15,449
32. 90062 65.9% 66.5% (-0.566)#748 66.9% (-0.979)#15,824
33. 90057 65.5% 66.5% (-0.929)#774 66.9% (-1.34)#16,307
34. 90058 65.2% 66.5% (-1.25)#798 66.9% (-1.66)#16,703
35. 90066 65.1% 66.5% (-1.36)#809 66.9% (-1.77)#16,856
36. 90064 64.8% 66.5% (-1.67)#827 66.9% (-2.09)#17,249
37. 90018 64.6% 66.5% (-1.88)#846 66.9% (-2.29)#17,480
38. 90012 64.4% 66.5% (-2.07)#860 66.9% (-2.48)#17,693
39. 90046 64.2% 66.5% (-2.24)#875 66.9% (-2.65)#17,914
40. 90031 63.9% 66.5% (-2.55)#890 66.9% (-2.97)#18,286
41. 90032 63.9% 66.5% (-2.60)#894 66.9% (-3.02)#18,335
42. 90049 63.7% 66.5% (-2.82)#910 66.9% (-3.23)#18,583
43. 90036 63.4% 66.5% (-3.05)#926 66.9% (-3.47)#18,874
44. 90007 63.4% 66.5% (-3.09)#927 66.9% (-3.50)#18,911
45. 90045 63.1% 66.5% (-3.42)#955 66.9% (-3.83)#19,289
46. 90013 62.6% 66.5% (-3.90)#985 66.9% (-4.32)#19,788
47. 90065 62.2% 66.5% (-4.27)#1,010 66.9% (-4.68)#20,170
48. 90008 62.1% 66.5% (-4.37)#1,015 66.9% (-4.78)#20,278
49. 90039 61.7% 66.5% (-4.80)#1,046 66.9% (-5.21)#20,759
50. 90047 61.5% 66.5% (-4.94)#1,057 66.9% (-5.35)#20,898
51. 90042 61.5% 66.5% (-5.01)#1,062 66.9% (-5.43)#20,992
52. 90043 61.2% 66.5% (-5.32)#1,074 66.9% (-5.73)#21,310
53. 90048 61.1% 66.5% (-5.38)#1,081 66.9% (-5.79)#21,365
54. 90035 58.8% 66.5% (-7.64)#1,197 66.9% (-8.05)#23,424
55. 90068 58.4% 66.5% (-8.08)#1,212 66.9% (-8.49)#23,778
56. 90041 58.0% 66.5% (-8.49)#1,236 66.9% (-8.91)#24,063
57. 90027 57.9% 66.5% (-8.54)#1,241 66.9% (-8.95)#24,087
58. 90056 55.6% 66.5% (-10.9)#1,341 66.9% (-11.3)#25,794
59. 90071 50.6% 66.5% (-15.9)#1,475 66.9% (-16.3)#28,225
60. 90077 47.8% 66.5% (-18.7)#1,512 66.9% (-19.1)#29,141
61. 90067 47.7% 66.5% (-18.7)#1,516 66.9% (-19.2)#29,170
62. 90024 47.1% 66.5% (-19.4)#1,525 66.9% (-19.8)#29,333
63. 90089 27.6% 66.5% (-38.9)#1,663 66.9% (-39.3)#31,709

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
77.0%
#2
76.8%
#3
76.5%
#4
75.6%
#5
75.3%
#6
75.1%
#7
74.9%
#8
73.9%
#9
73.5%
#10
72.8%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles, CA?
90003 has the Highest Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles, CA with 77.0%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in Los Angeles is 66.5%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in California?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in California is 66.5%.
What is the Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States?
Percentage of Private Company Employees in the United States is 66.9%.