Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Poverty | Single Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa MesaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLompocLong BeachLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaPortervilleRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles

48.6%
5.7%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code Single Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 90056 5.7% 20.3% (-14.6)#73 24.1% (-18.4)#1,271
2. 90034 8.5% 20.3% (-11.8)#164 24.1% (-15.6)#2,588
3. 90066 9.6% 20.3% (-10.7)#220 24.1% (-14.5)#3,194
4. 90028 9.8% 20.3% (-10.5)#228 24.1% (-14.2)#3,324
5. 90027 10.1% 20.3% (-10.2)#238 24.1% (-14.0)#3,441
6. 90045 10.8% 20.3% (-9.49)#277 24.1% (-13.3)#3,819
7. 90049 11.5% 20.3% (-8.80)#315 24.1% (-12.6)#4,225
8. 90046 11.9% 20.3% (-8.45)#335 24.1% (-12.2)#4,443
9. 90035 13.8% 20.3% (-6.51)#433 24.1% (-10.3)#5,571
10. 90025 15.7% 20.3% (-4.65)#513 24.1% (-8.42)#6,665
11. 90043 15.8% 20.3% (-4.51)#524 24.1% (-8.28)#6,750
12. 90067 16.5% 20.3% (-3.84)#555 24.1% (-7.61)#7,109
13. 90038 16.6% 20.3% (-3.75)#557 24.1% (-7.52)#7,144
14. 90039 16.7% 20.3% (-3.59)#566 24.1% (-7.36)#7,317
15. 90042 17.5% 20.3% (-2.82)#596 24.1% (-6.59)#7,719
16. 90064 18.2% 20.3% (-2.14)#632 24.1% (-5.91)#8,110
17. 90021 18.5% 20.3% (-1.79)#647 24.1% (-5.56)#8,352
18. 90041 19.1% 20.3% (-1.17)#680 24.1% (-4.94)#8,696
19. 90062 19.2% 20.3% (-1.07)#686 24.1% (-4.84)#8,761
20. 90024 19.5% 20.3% (-0.786)#699 24.1% (-4.56)#8,918
21. 90018 20.7% 20.3% (+0.398)#743 24.1% (-3.37)#9,605
22. 90014 20.8% 20.3% (+0.463)#747 24.1% (-3.31)#9,643
23. 90048 20.9% 20.3% (+0.546)#751 24.1% (-3.22)#9,682
24. 90020 21.5% 20.3% (+1.18)#780 24.1% (-2.59)#10,022
25. 90031 21.5% 20.3% (+1.24)#783 24.1% (-2.53)#10,052
26. 90022 22.0% 20.3% (+1.67)#801 24.1% (-2.10)#10,282
27. 90047 22.2% 20.3% (+1.91)#811 24.1% (-1.86)#10,394
28. 90063 22.3% 20.3% (+2.02)#818 24.1% (-1.75)#10,509
29. 90016 22.8% 20.3% (+2.51)#835 24.1% (-1.26)#10,764
30. 90036 23.0% 20.3% (+2.66)#846 24.1% (-1.11)#10,842
31. 90026 23.3% 20.3% (+2.96)#855 24.1% (-0.806)#11,045
32. 90057 23.4% 20.3% (+3.05)#860 24.1% (-0.722)#11,100
33. 90019 23.9% 20.3% (+3.58)#874 24.1% (-0.187)#11,393
34. 90032 24.4% 20.3% (+4.11)#887 24.1% (+0.339)#11,677
35. 90008 24.7% 20.3% (+4.35)#894 24.1% (+0.579)#11,784
36. 90004 24.7% 20.3% (+4.41)#898 24.1% (+0.643)#11,823
37. 90001 24.9% 20.3% (+4.63)#903 24.1% (+0.858)#11,915
38. 90065 25.3% 20.3% (+4.95)#917 24.1% (+1.18)#12,172
39. 90005 26.9% 20.3% (+6.59)#967 24.1% (+2.82)#13,031
40. 90007 27.1% 20.3% (+6.75)#970 24.1% (+2.98)#13,107
41. 90040 27.3% 20.3% (+6.97)#973 24.1% (+3.20)#13,194
42. 90029 27.8% 20.3% (+7.53)#988 24.1% (+3.76)#13,530
43. 90023 30.0% 20.3% (+9.71)#1,042 24.1% (+5.94)#14,650
44. 90002 30.8% 20.3% (+10.4)#1,056 24.1% (+6.67)#14,937
45. 90012 31.8% 20.3% (+11.5)#1,071 24.1% (+7.69)#15,368
46. 90059 32.1% 20.3% (+11.8)#1,079 24.1% (+7.99)#15,502
47. 90006 32.1% 20.3% (+11.8)#1,081 24.1% (+8.02)#15,512
48. 90044 32.4% 20.3% (+12.1)#1,084 24.1% (+8.30)#15,628
49. 90061 32.6% 20.3% (+12.3)#1,088 24.1% (+8.55)#15,727
50. 90037 33.7% 20.3% (+13.4)#1,102 24.1% (+9.65)#16,255
51. 90011 35.3% 20.3% (+15.0)#1,129 24.1% (+11.2)#16,845
52. 90033 37.5% 20.3% (+17.2)#1,158 24.1% (+13.5)#17,644
53. 90058 38.8% 20.3% (+18.5)#1,170 24.1% (+14.7)#17,993
54. 90003 40.1% 20.3% (+19.8)#1,193 24.1% (+16.0)#18,439
55. 90077 41.3% 20.3% (+21.0)#1,207 24.1% (+17.3)#18,762
56. 90015 42.1% 20.3% (+21.8)#1,211 24.1% (+18.1)#18,990
57. 90017 48.6% 20.3% (+28.3)#1,253 24.1% (+24.5)#20,410

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
0.0%
#2
0.0%
#3
0.0%
#4
5.7%
#5
8.5%
#6
9.6%
#7
9.8%
#8
10.1%
#9
10.8%
#10
11.5%
What zip code has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA?
90056 has the Lowest Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA with 5.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles, CA?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in Los Angeles is 23.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in California?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in California is 20.3%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Single Females in the United States is 24.1%.