Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles, CA

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Not-for-profit Organizations
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Los Angeles
States
California Cities
AlamedaAlhambraAnaheimAntiochApple ValleyArcadiaAuburnBakersfieldBerkeleyBeverly HillsBreaBuena ParkBurbankCamarilloCanoga ParkCanyon CountryCarlsbadCarsonCastro ValleyChicoChinoChula VistaCitrus HeightsClovisComptonConcordCoronaCosta MesaCovinaCulver CityDaly CityDanvilleDavisDesert Hot SpringsDowneyDuarteEl CajonEl MonteElk GroveEncinoEscondidoEurekaFairfieldFontanaFremontFresnoFullertonGarden GroveGardenaGlendaleGlendoraGrass ValleyHaywardHemetHesperiaHuntington BeachIndioInglewoodIrvineLa JollaLa MesaLa MiradaLa PuenteLake ElsinoreLakewoodLancasterLivermoreLodiLoma LindaLompocLong BeachLos AltosLos AngelesLos GatosMaderaMalibuMantecaMenifeeMercedMission ViejoModestoMonterey ParkMoragaMoreno ValleyMountain ViewMurrietaNapaNewport BeachNorth HollywoodNorthridgeNovatoOaklandOceansideOntarioOrangeOrovilleOxnardPalm DesertPalm SpringsPalmdalePalo AltoPasadenaPerrisPetalumaPleasantonPomonaRancho CordovaRancho CucamongaRancho Santa FeReddingRedlandsRedondo BeachRedwood CityRialtoRichmondRiversideRocklinRosevilleSacramentoSalinasSan BernardinoSan ClementeSan DiegoSan FranciscoSan GabrielSan JacintoSan JoseSan LeandroSan Luis ObispoSan MarcosSan MateoSan PedroSan RafaelSan RamonSanta AnaSanta BarbaraSanta ClaraSanta ClaritaSanta CruzSanta MariaSanta MonicaSanta RosaSherman OaksSimi ValleySpring ValleyStocktonSunnyvaleTemeculaThousand OaksTorranceTrabuco CanyonTracyTurlockTustinUplandVacavilleValenciaVallejoVan NuysVenturaVictorvilleVisaliaVistaWalnut CreekWest CovinaWest SacramentoWhittierWoodlandWoodland HillsYorba LindaYuba City
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles

0.0%
60.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles, CA

Zip Code % Employed in Not-for-profit vs State vs National
1.9008957.7%7.2%(+50.5)#88.4%(+49.2)#88
2.9005817.1%7.2%(+9.96)#738.4%(+8.68)#1,987
3.9002716.1%7.2%(+8.95)#778.4%(+7.66)#2,403
4.9000716.0%7.2%(+8.80)#798.4%(+7.52)#2,462
5.9002415.8%7.2%(+8.69)#808.4%(+7.40)#2,510
6.9005614.0%7.2%(+6.85)#1088.4%(+5.57)#3,584
7.9004513.0%7.2%(+5.87)#1438.4%(+4.58)#4,483
8.9001312.0%7.2%(+4.82)#1848.4%(+3.53)#5,674
9.9004111.2%7.2%(+4.01)#2098.4%(+2.72)#6,783
10.9003611.0%7.2%(+3.80)#2258.4%(+2.51)#7,137
11.9001210.4%7.2%(+3.19)#2648.4%(+1.91)#8,196
12.9003510.3%7.2%(+3.12)#2678.4%(+1.83)#8,355
13.900429.7%7.2%(+2.51)#3258.4%(+1.23)#9,582
14.900779.6%7.2%(+2.43)#3318.4%(+1.14)#9,778
15.900679.5%7.2%(+2.39)#3348.4%(+1.10)#9,864
16.900209.0%7.2%(+1.85)#3878.4%(+0.568)#11,037
17.900319.0%7.2%(+1.83)#3948.4%(+0.542)#11,096
18.900089.0%7.2%(+1.82)#3968.4%(+0.538)#11,104
19.900258.7%7.2%(+1.52)#4468.4%(+0.237)#11,850
20.900438.6%7.2%(+1.43)#4658.4%(+0.141)#12,059
21.900478.5%7.2%(+1.34)#4778.4%(+0.049)#12,288
22.900288.4%7.2%(+1.25)#4908.4%(-0.034)#12,528
23.900108.4%7.2%(+1.21)#4978.4%(-0.074)#12,638
24.900398.4%7.2%(+1.20)#4988.4%(-0.084)#12,664
25.900668.3%7.2%(+1.13)#5108.4%(-0.156)#12,862
26.900688.0%7.2%(+0.796)#5688.4%(-0.490)#13,752
27.900347.8%7.2%(+0.673)#5938.4%(-0.613)#14,084
28.900487.8%7.2%(+0.669)#5968.4%(-0.616)#14,101
29.900327.8%7.2%(+0.659)#5998.4%(-0.627)#14,131
30.900187.7%7.2%(+0.546)#6178.4%(-0.740)#14,461
31.900267.6%7.2%(+0.414)#6398.4%(-0.872)#14,850
32.900217.5%7.2%(+0.328)#6538.4%(-0.958)#15,101
33.900657.4%7.2%(+0.262)#6658.4%(-1.02)#15,310
34.900147.4%7.2%(+0.243)#6668.4%(-1.04)#15,363
35.900177.3%7.2%(+0.122)#6998.4%(-1.16)#15,770
36.900497.0%7.2%(-0.141)#7588.4%(-1.43)#16,522
37.900296.9%7.2%(-0.244)#7858.4%(-1.53)#16,826
38.900196.8%7.2%(-0.377)#8108.4%(-1.66)#17,206
39.900646.8%7.2%(-0.396)#8138.4%(-1.68)#17,270
40.900046.5%7.2%(-0.676)#8868.4%(-1.96)#18,064
41.900466.4%7.2%(-0.806)#9178.4%(-2.09)#18,468
42.900336.2%7.2%(-0.974)#9498.4%(-2.26)#18,931
43.900626.0%7.2%(-1.14)#9878.4%(-2.43)#19,429
44.900376.0%7.2%(-1.16)#9928.4%(-2.44)#19,472
45.900575.9%7.2%(-1.23)#1,0048.4%(-2.52)#19,685
46.900165.7%7.2%(-1.42)#1,0538.4%(-2.71)#20,260
47.900155.4%7.2%(-1.72)#1,1218.4%(-3.00)#21,113
48.900615.4%7.2%(-1.72)#1,1238.4%(-3.01)#21,132
49.900055.1%7.2%(-2.01)#1,1768.4%(-3.30)#21,935
50.900235.1%7.2%(-2.02)#1,1778.4%(-3.30)#21,955
51.900225.1%7.2%(-2.04)#1,1858.4%(-3.33)#22,033
52.900445.0%7.2%(-2.15)#1,2078.4%(-3.43)#22,301
53.900384.9%7.2%(-2.24)#1,2208.4%(-3.52)#22,517
54.900014.8%7.2%(-2.34)#1,2368.4%(-3.63)#22,781
55.900064.5%7.2%(-2.64)#1,2828.4%(-3.93)#23,506
56.900404.4%7.2%(-2.78)#1,3038.4%(-4.06)#23,842
57.900114.3%7.2%(-2.90)#1,3198.4%(-4.19)#24,130
58.900633.9%7.2%(-3.29)#1,3728.4%(-4.58)#24,971
59.900593.7%7.2%(-3.42)#1,3908.4%(-4.70)#25,261
60.900023.5%7.2%(-3.70)#1,4168.4%(-4.98)#25,815
61.900033.3%7.2%(-3.90)#1,4338.4%(-5.19)#26,191

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles, CA?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles, CA are:
#1
57.7%
#2
17.1%
#3
16.1%
#4
16.0%
#5
15.8%
#6
14.0%
#7
13.0%
#8
12.0%
#9
11.2%
#10
11.0%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles, CA?
90089 has the Highest Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles, CA with 57.7%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles, CA?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in Los Angeles is 7.3%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in California?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in California is 7.2%.
What is the Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States?
Percentage of Not-for-profit Organizations in the United States is 8.4%.