Crow vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,494,090 people shows a near-perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.936. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.070% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 70.5 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,729 compared to $52,044, a difference of 64.0%), median family income ($76,605 compared to $116,942, a difference of 52.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $113,215, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $55,891, a difference of 18.9%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $44,680, a difference of 26.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($49,234 compared to $64,512, a difference of 31.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 106.8%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 96.0%), and single father poverty (30.3% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 18.6%), receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 32.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 241.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 231.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 228.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 12.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 79.6%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 48.7%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (65.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.4%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 36.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 32.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 91.3%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 82.5%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.9% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.41%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.47%), and 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 48.4%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.43%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.6%).