Immigrants from Jordan vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,742,278 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Jordan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.415. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Jordan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.096% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Jordan corresponds to an increase of 96.4 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,066 compared to $52,044, a difference of 15.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,185 compared to $108,751, a difference of 11.9%), and median male earnings ($57,145 compared to $63,326, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.33%), householder income over 65 years ($63,041 compared to $64,512, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,164 compared to $113,215, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 15.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.39%), receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.2%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.64%), married-couple households (47.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 74.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.4%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.9%), and master's degree (16.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Jordan and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.25%), disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.95%).