Immigrants from Croatia vs Immigrants from Russia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,014,617 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Russia within Immigrant from Croatia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.539. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Croatia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.345% in Immigrants from Russia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Croatia corresponds to an increase of 345.0 Immigrants from Russia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,304 compared to $113,215, a difference of 4.5%), median household income ($92,225 compared to $96,378, a difference of 4.5%), and median family income ($112,323 compared to $116,942, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.55%), householder income over 65 years ($63,168 compared to $64,512, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,343 compared to $55,891, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 17.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.020%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.79%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 73.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 9.7%), family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.0%), family households (63.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and currently married (47.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.63%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.2% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (87.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.9%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and master's degree (17.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.4% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 0.13%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Croatia and Immigrants from Russia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.7%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.9%).