Immigrants from Russia vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,887,524 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.034% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 34.1 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 40.1%), per capita income ($52,044 compared to $38,766, a difference of 34.3%), and median male earnings ($63,326 compared to $48,040, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $51,038, a difference of 9.5%), median female earnings ($44,680 compared to $38,625, a difference of 15.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $54,027, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 56.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 37.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 2.7%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 33.7%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 52.0%), births to unmarried women (27.1% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 42.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (63.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.33, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.45%), no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 13.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 84.4%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 69.3%), and master's degree (19.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.6%).